2021
DOI: 10.33546/bnj.1927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research

Abstract: The number thirty is often used as the sample size in multiple questionnaires and identified as appropriate for validation of nursing research. However, this is not the best tool or strategy for sample size selection for development and validation, and this often causes immediate rejections of manuscripts. This editorial aims to provide an overview of the appropriate sample size for questionnaire development and validation. The article is the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.757) and validity (accumulative contribution rate = 63.5%). Gunawan & Marzilli [ 26 ] reported that construct validity may not be necessary if the translation process was accurate. In this study, the back-translation method and a translation equivalence evaluation completed by expert panel members were used to ensure the translation accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.757) and validity (accumulative contribution rate = 63.5%). Gunawan & Marzilli [ 26 ] reported that construct validity may not be necessary if the translation process was accurate. In this study, the back-translation method and a translation equivalence evaluation completed by expert panel members were used to ensure the translation accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are a variety of recommended sample sizes for test–retest reliability. The recommended sample size ranged from 50 to over 1000 subjects or the item to response ratio was from 1:3 to 1:20 [ 26 ]. Perneger et al [ 27 ] noted that a sample size of 30 could achieve a power of 80% to detect a problem that occurs in 5% of population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In deductive method, items development for a scale depends upon review of related and relevant literature as well as in depth assessment of existing scales (Hinkin, 1995). The researcher may utilize existing literature, interviews of the experts of related filed, or Delphi technique, or a blend of existing literature and interview may be used for item development purpose (Gunawan et al, 2021). The researchers used blend of both inductive and deductive methods for generation of themes and items during current study for development of Teachers' Performance Appraisal Scale (TPAS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample for the pre-test consisted of nurses from both hospitals, randomly selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria: being a nurse and working on clinical inpatient units for adults, while nurses on vacation or leave during data collection were excluded. The final sample totaled 20 participants (nine from Hospital A and 11 from Hospital B), which corresponds to the recommended number of 15 to 30 subjects in the pretesting stage (22) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%