2023
DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing age-adjusted trabecular bone score curves using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese women and men: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background: Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a relatively new gray-level textural parameter that provides information on bone microarchitecture. TBS has been shown to be a good predictor of fragility fractures independent of bone density and clinical risk factors. Estimating the normal reference values of TBS in both sexes among the Chinese population is necessary to improve the clinical fracture risk assessment.Methods: This retrospective study enrolled healthy Chinese participants living in Guangzhou, China, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquisition and evaluation of the scans were carried out by a single trained technician. Our laboratory had previously documented precision, as determined from an assessment involving 30 volunteers, yielding a root mean square coefficient of variance of less than 0.8% [ 16 ]. For postmenopausal women (≥50 years old) and men over 50 years old, low bone mass was considered with reference to the WHO bone mass diagnostic criteria, −2.5 < T-value < −1.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition and evaluation of the scans were carried out by a single trained technician. Our laboratory had previously documented precision, as determined from an assessment involving 30 volunteers, yielding a root mean square coefficient of variance of less than 0.8% [ 16 ]. For postmenopausal women (≥50 years old) and men over 50 years old, low bone mass was considered with reference to the WHO bone mass diagnostic criteria, −2.5 < T-value < −1.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research center [12] , 30 healthy volunteers were repeatedly measured by DXA to evaluate the precision of the instrument. The precision of the instrument was represented by the root mean square of the coe cient of variation (RMS-CV%).…”
Section: Precision Of Dxa Bone Density and The Tbsmentioning
confidence: 99%