2019
DOI: 10.1002/acg2.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a standardized system for review and adjudication of chronic graft‐vs‐host disease data in accordance with the National Institutes Consensus criteria

Abstract: Graft‐vs‐host Disease (GVHD) is a frequent complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HCT). The National Institute of Health consensus group established new guidelines for the evaluation of chronic GVHD. However, GVHD assessment remains challenging due to its complexity and requirement for laborious evaluation. We, therefore, established a standardized approach for the assessment of chronic GVHD in accordance with the NIH consensus criteria (NCC) guidelines. At a single institution, all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute GVHD (aGVHD) was graded using the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) grading system, except grades A–D were labelled as grades I–IV 16 . Grading was reviewed by a transplant clinician panel 17 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute GVHD (aGVHD) was graded using the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) grading system, except grades A–D were labelled as grades I–IV 16 . Grading was reviewed by a transplant clinician panel 17 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings support the utility of real-time adjudication in improving data quality and the implementation of this system in both interventional and observational studies, which is already routine practice in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium and other institutions. 11,13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings support the utility of real-time adjudication in improving data quality and the implementation of this system in both interventional and observational studies, which is already routine practice in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium and other institutions. 11,13 GVHD remains a clinical diagnosis. Pathologic findings have limited utility because of lack of specificity and sampling error, in particular, in intestinal biopsies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients with GVHD underwent allo-HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 2014 and 2018. Structured retrospective assessments for GVHD through HCT days 100, 180, and 365 were conducted by an institutional consensus committee (tables S2 and S3) ( 66 ). In the cases where death occurred after day 365, GVHD symptoms in the 8 weeks before death were assessed following the same structured format.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%