2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a semi-natural grassland: Effects of harvesting time and sowing density on species composition and structure of a restored Arrhenatherum elatius meadow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, ). Multiple harvest periods when different species with mature seeds are present increased transfer rate from 64% to 75% in an inland meadow (Scotton ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, ). Multiple harvest periods when different species with mature seeds are present increased transfer rate from 64% to 75% in an inland meadow (Scotton ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling time made a difference, with autumn driftline containing more propagules and more species than driftline sampled in spring (Bakker et al 2001(Bakker et al , 2007. Multiple harvest periods when different species with mature seeds are present increased transfer rate from 64% to 75% in an inland meadow (Scotton 2016).…”
Section: Driftline Germination Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental approaches have considerably strengthened the conceptual bases of restoration ecology by testing hypotheses from the field of community ecology (Wainwright et al, 2018) and exploring key processes in restoration operations such as biotic interactions or disturbances (Buisson, Corcket, & Dutoit, 2015). One of the principal processes that affects restoration success is the limited dispersal and recruitment of plant seeds in a context of habitat fragmentation (Pywell et al, 2002;Woodcock, McDonald, & Pywell, 2011), particularly after a long history of intensive agricultural practices that has reduced the number of floodplain grassland species seeds stored in the seed bank (Bischoff, Warthemann, & Klotz, 2009;Hedberg & Kotowski, 2010;Scotton, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from spontaneous colonization, one aspect is that species are often deliberately introduced to restore species‐poor grasslands (see Kiehl et al., ; Török et al., ). The techniques of species introduction comprise, among others, transfer of freshly cut seed‐rich hay (e.g., Baasch, Kirmer, & Tischew, ; Edwards et al., ; Klimkowska, Van Diggelen, Bakker, & Grootjans, ; Schmiede, Otte, & Donath, ), transfer of diaspores extracted from fresh hay by on‐site threshing (Scotton, ; Scotton, Kirmer, & Krautzer, ), sowing of regional seed mixtures (Kirmer, Baasch & Tischew ; Lepš et al., ; Prach, Jongepierová, & Řehounková, ; Warren, Christal, & Wilson, ). or a combination of several of these measures (Baasch, Engst, Schmiede, May, & Tischew, ; Engst et al., ; Török et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the importance of all factors mentioned so far vary with time. In general, many restoration projects report increasing establishment success with time (Pywell et al., ; Scotton, ). In the first years, species have to quickly germinate to leave the seedling stage, which probably is facilitated by a large diaspore size (Leishman et al., ; Westoby et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%