2015
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a Nomogram for Stage IA-IIB Cervical Cancer Patients after Complete Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the c-index, which is conceptually similar to receiver operating characteristics curve analysis [ 79 , 80 ], was 0.723. The most recent study by Zhou et al establishes a nomogram predicting 5–year overall survival of surgically-treated stage IA-IIB cervical cancer patients [ 4 ]. The authors used a number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph-vascular space invasion, stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, tumor diameter, and histology as input variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of the c-index, which is conceptually similar to receiver operating characteristics curve analysis [ 79 , 80 ], was 0.723. The most recent study by Zhou et al establishes a nomogram predicting 5–year overall survival of surgically-treated stage IA-IIB cervical cancer patients [ 4 ]. The authors used a number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph-vascular space invasion, stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, tumor diameter, and histology as input variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the FIGO staging system serves as the main tool for estimating the general prognosis, it does not include all established prognostic factors, such as lymph node metastases, lymph-vascular space invasion, deep stromal infiltration, or histologic subtype. Another method for individual prediction of survival in cervical carcinoma is the recently developed nomograms based on selected demographic and clinical parameters [ 3 , 4 ]. None of these systems take into account intra/postoperative complications and concomitant diseases, however, which could alter patients outcome [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several nomograms have been reported to predict prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. 15,16,34 Zhou et al 35 developed a nomogram predicting 5-year OS of 1563 surgically treated cervical cancer patients with a C-index of 0.71. In their study, clinical and pathological parameters such as lymph node metastasis, LVSI, stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, tumor diameter, and histology were identified as independent prognostic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different from other studies, stage IIB patients also received surgeries and were included in their study. 35 Je et al 36 However, in our study, clinical, hematogical, and pathological data were included to construct a nomogram for OS with a high C-index of 0.74. Polterauer et al 16 developed a nomogram for OS with a C-index of 0.723, and 6 parameters such as FIGO stage, tumor size, age, histologic subtype, lymph node ratio, and parametrial involvement were selected as nomogram covariates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nomogram is a practical model for accurately predicting the survival outcome of individual clinical patients [15]. The FIGO staging system is the most commonly used for the clinical evaluation of cervical cancer [16]. However, the updated system of patients with lymph node-positive status into a single-stage could produce a highly heterogeneous population with signi cant differences in survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%