Establishing a Data Science Unit in an Academic Medical Center: An Illustrative Model

Abstract

The field of data science has great potential to address critical questions relevant for academic medical centers. Data science initiatives are consequently being established within academic medicine. At the cornerstone of such initiatives are scientists who practice data science. These scientists include biostatisticians, clinical informaticians, database and software developers, computational scientists, and computational biologists. Too often, however, those involved in the practice of data science are viewed by academic leadership as providing a noncomplex service to facilitate research and further the careers of other academic faculty. The authors contend that the success of data science initiatives relies heavily on the understanding that the practice of data science is a critical intellectual contribution to the overall science conducted at an academic medical center. Further, careful thought by academic leadership is needed for allocation of resources devoted to the practice of data science. At the Stanford University School of Medicine, the authors have developed an innovative model for a data science collaboratory based on 4 fundamental elements: an emphasis on collaboration over consultation, a subscription-based funding mechanism that reflects commitment by key partners, an investment in the career development of faculty who practice data science, and a strong educational component for data science members in team science and for clinical and translational investigators in data science. As data science becomes increasingly essential to learning health systems, centers that specialize in the practice of data science are a critical component of the research infrastructure and intellectual environment of academic medical centers.

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

“…Finally, training and establishment of data science units within healthcare systems [7], ideally jointly across operations and research can also support deployment and management of AI in healthcare. Jaber Rad, Karthik K.…”

Conditional uncertainty: Misinterpretations of “significant” p values

“…Statistical scientists working with clinical scientists can verify that assumptions behind experimental designs, analytic approaches, and inference are valid. All dissemination of findings should include collaboration with statistical scientists to ensure that interpretations are correct 9 . In the case of the prosecutor's fallacy, A statistical scientist would have easily been able to provide an accurate interpretation of the “match” and the inference we can draw from it.…”

“…All dissemination of findings should include collaboration with statistical scientists to ensure that interpretations are correct. 9 In the case of the prosecutor's fallacy, A statistical scientist would have easily been able to provide an accurate interpretation of the "match" and the inference we can draw from it. A statistical scientist collaborating in clinical research investigations can do the same in the dissemination of findings and interpretation of results.…”

Developing partnerships for academic data science consulting and collaboration units

“…University leadership, PIs of laboratories or PhD advisors may view some of these activities as routine (Desai et al, 2022), but not taking them seriously results in reproducibility issues, suboptimal or even incorrect choices of analyses or interpretation (https://stratos-initiative.org/en; Baillie et al, 2022; Sauerbrei et al, 2014) or questionable research practices such as low statistical power, p‐hacking and selective reporting (Bishop, 2019; Held & Schwab, 2020). DSU staff are integral members of research teams often fulfilling a variety of roles such as expert professional, advocate, communicator or leader (Zapf et al, 2019).…”