2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-019-09782-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a correlation between RIN and A260/280 along with the multivariate evaluation of factors affecting the quality of RNA in cryopreserved cancer bio-specimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In brain tissue, RNA quality of controls has been reported to be significantly higher than in disease conditions, but overall RNA quality was independent of PMD up to 36 h (White et al, 2018). In addition, RNA quality is independent of storage time (White et al, 2018;Shah et al, 2019). RNA quality differences within one dataset might mask biologically relevant information.…”
Section: Preanalytical Factors To Consider During Microglia Transcripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brain tissue, RNA quality of controls has been reported to be significantly higher than in disease conditions, but overall RNA quality was independent of PMD up to 36 h (White et al, 2018). In addition, RNA quality is independent of storage time (White et al, 2018;Shah et al, 2019). RNA quality differences within one dataset might mask biologically relevant information.…”
Section: Preanalytical Factors To Consider During Microglia Transcripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is made The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted March 10, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.10.434738 doi: bioRxiv preprint ovary; infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast; squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (tongue, buccal mucosa) and penis; hepatocellular carcinoma of the liver; glioblastoma of the brain; renal cell carcinoma of kidney and seminoma of testis were retrieved from EMR database of TMH (http://10.100.52.12/emrtmhact/default.asp). Histopathology analysis of tissues was confirmed earlier (Shah et al, 2019). The samples with more than 70% tumor content were processed for further studies.…”
Section: Human Normal Rnamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The protocol was adapted from Shah et al 2019. In brief, total RNA was isolated from human normal and tumor tissues according to manufacture protocol (Agilent Cat#400800), and the quantity and quality were confirmed by NanoDrop 2000C spectrophotometer, and agarose formaldehyde denaturing gel electrophoresis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration, purity, and integrity of the extracted RNA greatly affect the results of gene testing. The concentration and purity of RNA are mainly affected by the impurities in BPE [21-24]. The more the impurities, the lower the concentration and purity of extracted RNA, and the better the integrity and representativeness of RNA, the closer the transcribed cDNA is to the natural state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%