2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06419-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a core outcome set for neurogenic bladder trials: study protocol for a scoping review and Delphi surveys

Abstract: Background Neurogenic bladder (NGB) is a chronic and disabling condition with a high prevalence rate, which can cause economic burden on patients and their families and reduce the quality of life of patients. Researchers have carried out a large number of clinical trials on the effectiveness and safety of different interventions for the treatment of NGB. The published clinical trials of NGB generally suffered from inconsistent and irregular reporting of outcome indicators. To facilitate future … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a pronounced heterogeneity and low comparability between studies. This makes it di cult to compare and pool results, and therefore restricts the application and promotion of perioperative exercise and hinders the synthesis of evidence [31]. How effective these exercise interventions are can only be truly understood if clinical trials report the same outcomes, which are measured and de ned in the same way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a pronounced heterogeneity and low comparability between studies. This makes it di cult to compare and pool results, and therefore restricts the application and promotion of perioperative exercise and hinders the synthesis of evidence [31]. How effective these exercise interventions are can only be truly understood if clinical trials report the same outcomes, which are measured and de ned in the same way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disagreement will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Results will include all unique outcomes and a frequency table of the most reported outcomes, sorted per outcome domain [ 22 ]. This list of unique outcomes will be presented to the expert panel (phase 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus on the optimal sample size for the Delphi study, and based on the content of published literature, sample sizes for health professionals typically range from 30 to 120 participants [ 22 , 25 , 26 ]. In this study, following the research purpose of the project, we adhered to the principles of authority, representativeness, and regionality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%