2010
DOI: 10.2225/vol13-issue3-fulltext-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EST sequencing and SSR marker development from cultivated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found 7,413 perfectly repeated di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs (7.3% of the unigenes contained SSRs). The SSR frequency in the above EST resources is comparable with previous reports in cultivated peanut [36,37], and wild Arachis species [38]. The overall SSR density was 3,190 bp per Mb and corresponded to approximately 1 per 5 kb of the genic region, which is similar to a previous report of 1/5.5 kb in cultivated peanut [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found 7,413 perfectly repeated di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs (7.3% of the unigenes contained SSRs). The SSR frequency in the above EST resources is comparable with previous reports in cultivated peanut [36,37], and wild Arachis species [38]. The overall SSR density was 3,190 bp per Mb and corresponded to approximately 1 per 5 kb of the genic region, which is similar to a previous report of 1/5.5 kb in cultivated peanut [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The motif types (AG)n and (AAG)n have been reported as the most common di- and tri-nucleotide repeats identified in other plant EST databases [43,45-47], including peanut ( A . hypogaea ) [15,30,37,40,48,49]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first studies were based on isozymes and proteins (Krishna and Mitra 1988;Grieshammer and Wynne 1990;Lu and Pickersgill 1993), followed by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-RFLPs Paik-Ro et al 1992;Kochert et al 1996), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNARAPDs (Halward et al , 1992Hilu and Stalker 1995;Subramanian et al 2000), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism-AFLPs (He and Prakash, 1997;Gimenes et al 2000;He and Prakash 2001;Gimenes et al 2002;Herselman, 2003;Milla et al 2005aMilla et al , 2005bTallury et al 2005), and more recently microsatellite markers (Hopkins et al 1999;Palmieri et al 2002;He et al 2003;Ferguson et al 2004;Moretzsohn et al 2004;He et al 2005;Moretzsohn et al 2005;Palmieri et al 2005;Bravo et al 2006;Budiman et al 2006;Gimenes et al 2007;Proite et al 2007;Wang et al 2007;Cuc et al 2008;Naito et al 2008;Liang et al 2009;Moretzsohn et al 2009;Song et al 2010;Yuan et al 2010;Koilkonda et al 2012;Macedo et al 2012;Pandey et al 2012) and...…”
Section: Molecular Markers For Arachismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of them, the development and use of DNA markers is the frontrunner with significant applications in developing new crop varieties with considerable genetic gain (Yuan et al, 2017). Though several types of marker systems are available in groundnut, most of them suffer from low polymorphism especially in cultivated groundnut (Song et al, 2010;Khera et al, 2013) over the wild types (Moretzsohn et al, 2009), which limits their application in crop improvement (for review, Holbrook et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%