2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EST analysis online: WWW tools for detection of SNPs and alternative splice forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several genome-wide studies estimate that 40% to 75% of human genes have alternative splice forms (42)(43)(44)(45)(46). Alternative splicing plays a major role in modulating gene function by increasing the diversity of expressed mRNA transcripts (44,47) and is considered to be particularly prevalent in human brain, which has a greater number of splice variants than any other organ (48,49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several genome-wide studies estimate that 40% to 75% of human genes have alternative splice forms (42)(43)(44)(45)(46). Alternative splicing plays a major role in modulating gene function by increasing the diversity of expressed mRNA transcripts (44,47) and is considered to be particularly prevalent in human brain, which has a greater number of splice variants than any other organ (48,49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESTs were chosen for SNP analysis based on three criteria (Brett et al, 2000): (1) an expect value smaller than 1e -100 in a BLASTN search; (2) over 95 % identity over 100 bp; and (3) only if at least two different ESTs contained the same polymorphic change, it was considered as an SNP site. No SNPs were found within the coding region of Dnmt3l; however, the 3)-UTR contained several potential SNPs.…”
Section: Genomic Organization Of Dnmt3lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many experimental techniques for high-throughput SNP mining have been developed (for review, see Vignal et al 2002), the generation of dense polymorphism maps is still a laborious and timeconsuming procedure. The alternative, in silico identification of SNPs using large data sets generated by sequencing projects, is a quick and cost-efficient approach for the generation of impressive amounts of candidate SNPs.Several candidate SNP detection pipelines based on EST data analysis have been described previously (Buetow et al 1999;Marth et al 1999;Picoult-Newberg et al 1999;Brett et al 2000). Application of computationally intensive BLAST search and/or Phrap fragment assembler, which are common first steps in most pipelines for candidate SNPs discovery, does not allow incorporation of large amounts of sequence data, as, for example, produced by whole-genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several candidate SNP detection pipelines based on EST data analysis have been described previously (Buetow et al 1999;Marth et al 1999;Picoult-Newberg et al 1999;Brett et al 2000). Application of computationally intensive BLAST search and/or Phrap fragment assembler, which are common first steps in most pipelines for candidate SNPs discovery, does not allow incorporation of large amounts of sequence data, as, for example, produced by whole-genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%