2002
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.21.6.628.22793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essentialist Beliefs About Mental Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
98
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, field studies have reported similar contextual findings of ethnic identity salience on well-being (Downie, et al, 2006;Yip, 2005). In addition, research on lay theories has shown that studies that experimentally activate lay theories provide similar findings as when the endorsement of theories are measured by self-report (e.g., Haslam & Ernst, 2002;Verkuyten, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, field studies have reported similar contextual findings of ethnic identity salience on well-being (Downie, et al, 2006;Yip, 2005). In addition, research on lay theories has shown that studies that experimentally activate lay theories provide similar findings as when the endorsement of theories are measured by self-report (e.g., Haslam & Ernst, 2002;Verkuyten, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Meehl, 1978). When an essencelike cause becomes known, an endophenotype becomes a closed concept, but, contrary to the essentialist beliefs of most laypersons (Haslam & Ernst, 2002), most endophenotypes in psychopathology (including category-like ones) have no essence-like cause and thus remain open concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research into psychological essentialism has been exciting and extensive (for some overviews, see Ahn et al, 2001;Gelman, 2003Gelman, , 2004Murphy, 2002;Rakison & Oates, 2003; for a critique, see Strevens, 2000), with the idea of essentialism explored in a variety of ways and in a range of different domains (e.g., Evans, 2001;Haslam & Ernst, 2002). While modifications to the original theory have been proposed (e.g., Hampton et al, 2007;Hampton et al, 2009;and Malt, 1994, have questioned whether people indeed always think of essences as being unchangeable), and while it is unclear whether adults always use strict essentialist categorization in all tasks (Hampton et al, 2007), it is generally assumed that, at least for natural kinds, some kind of essentialist reasoning is involved in categorization.…”
Section: Psychological Essentialismmentioning
confidence: 99%