1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(98)00283-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essential oils analysis. I. Evaluation of essential oils composition using both GC and MS fingerprints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15] Whenever possible, the constituents were matched by co-injection with authentic compounds. The relative amounts of individual components are based on peak area obtained without consideration of the FID calibration factors (i.e.…”
Section: Identification Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Whenever possible, the constituents were matched by co-injection with authentic compounds. The relative amounts of individual components are based on peak area obtained without consideration of the FID calibration factors (i.e.…”
Section: Identification Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fingerprint technique is a powerful tool and has been widely accepted as a useful approach for the evaluation and quality control of multi-component herbal materials and their finished products [1,2]. There have been a number of reports regarding the use of HPLC, GC, GC × GC, CE, HPTLC and IR fingerprints on the quality assessment of some herbal medicines and their raw materials [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of natural products can be seen in many literature reports, and typical of these is the work of Stashenko et al [1], who reported the identification of many of the components of the essential oil produced by Lepechinia schiedeana, by using GCMS. The use of the two criteria, relative retention indices and mass spectral data, for essential oil compositional analysis was developed into an evaluation index [2] which balanced the contribution of the two criteria to aid final identification. The use of mass spectral results alone may lead to erroneous results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%