1993
DOI: 10.1016/0040-9383(93)90038-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essential laminations in seifert-fibered spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result, as well as those of [1] and [2], illustrates a technique for attacking problems whose solutions for incompressible surfaces relies on induction (on the number of points of intersection with a 1-dimensional object). The technique used here is, in fact, simply a different way of thinking about this induction process; instead, it is something we might call 'eventual stability under a sequence of isotopies'.…”
Section: Corollary M Contains An Essential Lamination Iff It Containmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result, as well as those of [1] and [2], illustrates a technique for attacking problems whose solutions for incompressible surfaces relies on induction (on the number of points of intersection with a 1-dimensional object). The technique used here is, in fact, simply a different way of thinking about this induction process; instead, it is something we might call 'eventual stability under a sequence of isotopies'.…”
Section: Corollary M Contains An Essential Lamination Iff It Containmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We shall describe an algorithm for performing a (typically infinite time) isotopy of £, controlled along the intersection of C with the 1-skeleton τ^ of r. After identifying a collection of points which are left fixed by all of the isotopies, we then study what happens when we take the 'limit' of these isotopies. At this point the proof diverges markedly from [1]; seeing that pieces of the lamination stabilize around these fixed points is easier, but in the situation encountered here, the union of these stable pieces is not a lamination -it is a disjoint union of 1-to-l immersed surfaces, but it is not, in general, a closed set.…”
Section: Corollary M Contains An Essential Lamination Iff It Containmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An application of [38, Theorem 1.8 (2)] shows that if ∆(r, r 0 ) > 1, then X (r) is not an I-bundle over a surface F with ∂ v X (r) the I-bundle over ∂F . But then by [4], M (r) cannot be atoroidal Seifert fibred and hence ∆(r, r 0 ) ≤ 1 as claimed.…”
Section: Fillings Of Manifolds Of Large First Betti Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if S is an essential closed surface in M K and C(S) is finite, each of its slopes is a singular slope of S. In particular this is true for µ K . (4). Let r i be a very big Seifert surgery slope on ∂M K .…”
Section: Proof Of Part (1) Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%