Essential elements of questionnaire design and development

Abstract

Essential elements of questionnaire design and development Aims. The aims of this paper were (1) to raise awareness of the issues in questionnaire development and subsequent psychometric evaluation, and (2) to provide strategies to enable nurse researchers to design and develop their own measure and evaluate the quality of existing nursing measures. Background. The number of questionnaires developed by nurses has increased in recent years. While the rigour applied to the questionnaire development process may be improving, we know that nurses are still not generally adept at the psychometric evaluation of new measures. This paper explores the process by which a reliable and valid questionnaire can be developed. Methods. We critically evaluate the theoretical and methodological issues associated with questionnaire design and development and present a series of heuristic decision-making strategies at each stage of such development. The range of available scales is presented and we discuss strategies to enable item generation and development. The importance of stating a priori the number of factors expected in a prototypic measure is emphasized. Issues of reliability and validity are explored using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and illustrated using examples from recent nursing research literature. Conclusion. Questionnaire design and development must be supported by a logical, systematic and structured approach. To aid this process we present a framework that supports this and suggest strategies to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the new and developing measure. Relevance to clinical practice. In developing the evidence base of nursing practice using this method of data collection, it is vital that questionnaire design incorporates preplanned methods to establish reliability and validity. Failure to develop a questionnaire sufficiently may lead to difficulty interpreting results, and this may impact upon clinical or educational practice. This paper presents a critical evaluation of the questionnaire design and development process and demonstrates good practice at each stage of this process.

Development and evaluation of ′neck pain and functional limitation scale′: A validation study in the Asian context

“…[24] Therefore, NBQ tool with established validity and reliability was added in this study to test the psychometric properties of NPFLS. [7] The results of this study revealed that NPFLS was an internally consistent and valid measure that could be used to distinguish patients with neck pain from other healthy volunteers.…”

Treating reading comprehension deficits in sub-acute brain injury rehabilitation: Identifying clinical practice and management

“…Definitions of these terms were provided to survey respondents as a glossary (see Appendix A). were used to aid in comparison of responses 66 . Free text boxes were used to capture broader information and were also available in each section for participants to provide additional comments if desired.…”

Money matters: exploiting the data from outcomes research for quality improvement initiatives

“…While in the past attention was focused on outcomes from the clinician's perspective, during the last decade there has been increasing recognition of the notion that the assessment of patient perceptions allows for a more complete evaluation of the patient's health status [8][9][10]. For this reason, the use of patientoriented questionnaires as a method of data collection has gained increasing popularity [11].…”