2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essential but Not Vulnerable: Indazole Sulfonamides Targeting Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase as Potential Leads againstMycobacterium tuberculosis

Abstract: A potent, non-cytotoxic indazole sulfonamide was identified by high-throughput screening of >100,000 synthetic compounds for activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). This non-cytotoxic compound did not directly inhibit cell wall biogenesis but triggered a slow lysis of Mtb cells as measured by release of intracellular green fluorescent protein (GFP). Isolation of resistant mutants followed by whole-genome sequencing showed an unusual gene amplification of a 40 gene region spanning Rv3371 to Rv3411c a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For agents such as griselimycin, target amplification in the genome confirmed the target of the natural product (Kling et al, 2015). Similarly, resistance to an indazole sulfonamide scaffold was only observed in mutants that resulted in gene amplification, with subsequent structural studies providing an explanation: the inhibitor's interactions were almost exclusively made with the cofactor in the active site of the target, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (Park et al, 2016). In some cases, the target is refractory to mutations that confer resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For agents such as griselimycin, target amplification in the genome confirmed the target of the natural product (Kling et al, 2015). Similarly, resistance to an indazole sulfonamide scaffold was only observed in mutants that resulted in gene amplification, with subsequent structural studies providing an explanation: the inhibitor's interactions were almost exclusively made with the cofactor in the active site of the target, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (Park et al, 2016). In some cases, the target is refractory to mutations that confer resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…
Figure 3.Avoiding resistance hotspots.The GuaB2 inhibitor VCC234718 (represented as yellow sticks [52]) stacks on top of IMP (represented as black sticks) in a similar manner to NAD (represented as orange sticks), but makes different interactions to the neighbouring protomer unit through Y487, which is mutated leading to resistance. Optimisation of a separate scaffold (Compound 6, represented as purple sticks [53]) more closely mimicked the interactions made by NAD, and was active against the Y487C mutant.
…”
Section: Mutations and Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimisation of a separate scaffold (Compound 6, represented as purple sticks [53]) more closely mimicked the interactions made by NAD, and was active against the Y487C mutant.…”
Section: Mutations and Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this instance, the lead molecule, 7759844, demonstrated high potency with a K i 0.603 μM and MIC of 0.633 μg.ml −1 , however displayed toxicity in a chronic mouse model18. Several crystal structures of GuaB2 from Mtb have recently been determined in complex with substrate, product and cofactors along with a number of new compounds with anti-mycobacterial activity192021. This enhanced understanding of the biophysics of GuaB2 inhibition can be used for in silico drug discovery and for the assessment of newly discovered anti-mycobacterial compounds targeting GuaB2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%