2011
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.50.6140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophagopericardial Fistula with Pyopneumopericardium Secondary to Esophageal Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment of pneumopericardium is also dependent on its presentation. Patients with hemodynamic instability require emergent pericardiocentesis 1,2,5,7 . Watchful waiting may be considered if asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable, as it happened to our patient and with Caselli et al 3 and Durães‐Campos et al, 6 as it can resolve spontaneously or by treatment of the underlying condition 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treatment of pneumopericardium is also dependent on its presentation. Patients with hemodynamic instability require emergent pericardiocentesis 1,2,5,7 . Watchful waiting may be considered if asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable, as it happened to our patient and with Caselli et al 3 and Durães‐Campos et al, 6 as it can resolve spontaneously or by treatment of the underlying condition 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Comparing with current literature, 1–6 cases of pneumopericardium have variable prognosis. In the setting of an esophago‐pericardial fistula, it may resolve with therapy directed to the condition responsible for the fistula formation and scarring by second intention, but it is still a dreaded situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The treatment of pneumopericardium is also dependent on its presentation. Patients with hemodynamic instability require emergent pericardiocentesis [1,2,5,7]. Watchful waiting may be considered if asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable, as it happened to our patient and with Caselli et al [3] and Durães-Campos et al [6], as it can resolve spontaneously or by treatment of the underlying condition [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Comparing with current literature [1][2][3][4][5][6], cases of pneumopericardium have variable prognosis. In the setting of an esophago-pericardial fistula, it may resolve with therapy directed to the condition responsible for the fistula formation and scarring by second intention, but it is still a dreaded situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Esophageal surgeons need to be aware of the late complications and associated atypical symptoms of historical procedures which are no longer in common usage. Where an enteropericardial fistula is present, defunctioning of the upper GI tract or repair with transposition of vascularized tissue gives a better chance of a successful outcome.
Summary of treatment strategies for enteropericardial fistulae Types of surgical management Patient outcome Number of patients defunctioned Number of patients with surgical management (interposition including redo fundoplication) Number of patients with nondefunctioning or noninterposition surgery Number of patients with nonsurgical management Number of patients who died during initial resuscitation or surgery (excluding those treated conservatively initially) Resection and transposition of healthy viscusAlive[7] 1,2,5–9 Dead[2] 10,11 (including one substernal bypass)Gastropericardial fistula associated with hiatal hernia ± fundoplicationAlive[9] 12–20 [3] 21,22 (including one alive but with unresolved fistula)Dead[1] 23 [2] 24,25 [2] 3,26 (including one with late surgery)[1] 26 Post surgery for esophageal stricture or atresiaAlive[5] 27–29 (including current case 1 & 2)[1] 30 [1] 31 Dead[3] 32–34 [4] 26,35,36 [1] 37 Post surgery for upper GI malignancyAlive[1] 38 [2] 39,40 [1] 41 Dead[3] 42–44 [4] 45–48 (including one stent)[1] 49 (Autopsy)Upper GI malignancy – nonsurgicalAlive[2] 4,50 (including one stent)Dead[1] 51 [6] 52–57 (including two stents)Miscellaneous (trauma, peptic ulcer)Alive[1] 58 [3] 59,6...
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%