Abstract:Dose-volume parameters are needed to guide the safe administration of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). We report on esophageal tolerance to high-dose hypofractionated radiation in patients treated with SABR. Thirty-one patients with spine or lung tumors received single- or multiple-fraction SABR to targets less than 1 cm from the esophagus. End points evaluated include D(5cc) (minimum dose in Gy to 5 cm(3) of the esophagus receiving the highest dose), D(2cc) , D(1cc) , and D(max) (maximum dose to 0.0… Show more
“…[23] This was a smaller series and included patients receiving SBRT as a boost to conventionally fractionated therapy, and the authors only analyzed a limited number of predetermined D v endpoints. Another series of central lung SBRT included a subset of 15 patients with tumors near the esophagus treated with 6 fractions of 8Gy and observed an overall 11% rate of acute Grade 1–2 esophagitis.…”
Background and Purpose
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to central lung tumors can cause esophageal toxicity, but little is known about the incidence or risk factors. We reviewed central lung SBRT patients to identify dosimetric factors predictive of esophageal toxicity.
Material and Methods
We assessed esophageal toxicity in 125 SBRT patients. Using biological equivalent doses with α/β=10 Gy (BED10), dose-volume histogram variables for the esophagus (Dv and Vd) were assessed for correlation with grade ≥2 acute toxicity.
Results
Incidence of grade ≥2 acute toxicity was 12% (n=15). Highly significant logistic models were generated for D5cc and Dmax (p<0.001). To keep the complication rate < 20%, the model requires that D5cc ≤ 26.3 BED10. At 2 years, the probability of complication with BED10 D5cc > 14.4 Gy was 24%, compared to 1.6% if ≤14.4 Gy.
Conclusions
This novel analysis provides guidelines to predict acute esophageal toxicity in lung SBRT. Dose to the hottest 5cc and Dmax of the esophagus were the best predictors of toxicity. Converting the BED10 limits to physical doses, D5cc to the esophagus should be kept less than 16.8, 18.1 and 19.0 Gy for 3, 4, and 5 fractions, respectively, to keep the acute toxicity rate < 20%.
“…[23] This was a smaller series and included patients receiving SBRT as a boost to conventionally fractionated therapy, and the authors only analyzed a limited number of predetermined D v endpoints. Another series of central lung SBRT included a subset of 15 patients with tumors near the esophagus treated with 6 fractions of 8Gy and observed an overall 11% rate of acute Grade 1–2 esophagitis.…”
Background and Purpose
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to central lung tumors can cause esophageal toxicity, but little is known about the incidence or risk factors. We reviewed central lung SBRT patients to identify dosimetric factors predictive of esophageal toxicity.
Material and Methods
We assessed esophageal toxicity in 125 SBRT patients. Using biological equivalent doses with α/β=10 Gy (BED10), dose-volume histogram variables for the esophagus (Dv and Vd) were assessed for correlation with grade ≥2 acute toxicity.
Results
Incidence of grade ≥2 acute toxicity was 12% (n=15). Highly significant logistic models were generated for D5cc and Dmax (p<0.001). To keep the complication rate < 20%, the model requires that D5cc ≤ 26.3 BED10. At 2 years, the probability of complication with BED10 D5cc > 14.4 Gy was 24%, compared to 1.6% if ≤14.4 Gy.
Conclusions
This novel analysis provides guidelines to predict acute esophageal toxicity in lung SBRT. Dose to the hottest 5cc and Dmax of the esophagus were the best predictors of toxicity. Converting the BED10 limits to physical doses, D5cc to the esophagus should be kept less than 16.8, 18.1 and 19.0 Gy for 3, 4, and 5 fractions, respectively, to keep the acute toxicity rate < 20%.
“…4,6,7 Stephans et al 5 demonstrated a late gradeZ3 incidence of 3.8%; however, both events were tracheoesophageal fistulas in patients given adjuvant VEGF-modulating agents. Abelson et al 16 reported a gradeZ4 toxicity rate of 6.4%. In our analysis, we demonstrated gradeZ2 and gradeZ3 esophagitis rates of 5.7% and 0.6%, respectively-in light of the few gradeZ3 events, it is therefore important to note that our dosimetric parameters are most predictive of the less severe grade 2 toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In an analysis of 182 patients treated with single-fraction SRS, Cox et al 7 revealed that D2.5 mL was the best predictor of esophagitis (P < 0.0006). In a cohort of 31 patients (treated with a wide variety of SBRT fractionation schemes), Abelson et al 16 studied the equivalent single-fraction BED3 to 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 mL, and maximal point and determined that severe toxicities occurred near previously published thresholds. Other studies have recommended the use of V15 in single-fraction SRS to prevent esophagitis.…”
BED to 1.5 mL was the strongest predictor of grade≥2 esophagitis (independent of α/β ratio) with a 10.6% toxicity risk when BED10>21.1 Gy (14.3 Gy in 3 fractions, 16.0 Gy in 5). The overall rate of severe toxicity is low, suggesting that higher doses may be tolerable.
“…Comparing to spinal cord, the dose constraints to the esophagus in spinal SRS/SBRT are less understood. Even though the dose constraint standard has yet been established for esophagus, partial volume constraints, such as dose to a small volume of 1 to 5 cc (D1 cc to D5 cc), and Dmax have been suggested in previous reports and used in clinical trials 18, 19, 20. Unlike a point dose, such as Dmax to the cord, which is unlikely to be effected by the extra vertebrae, a partial volume parameter, like D1 cc, generally increases with move critical structure volume receiving dose.…”
The purpose of this study is to identify regions of spinal column in which more than three contiguous vertebrae can be reliably and quickly aligned within 1 mm using a 6‐degree (6D) couch and full body immobilization device. We analyzed 45 cases treated over a 3‐month period. Each case was aligned using ExacTrac x‐ray positioning system with integrated 6D couch to be within 1° and 1 mm in all six dimensions. Cone‐Beam computed tomography (CBCT) with at least 17.5 cm field of view (FOV) in the superior–inferior direction was taken immediately after ExacTrac positioning. It was used to examine the residual error of five to nine contiguous vertebrae visible in the FOV. The residual error of each vertebra was determined by expanding/contracting the vertebrae contour with a margin in millimeter integrals on the planning CT such that the new contours would enclose the corresponding vertebrae contour on CBCT. Submillimeter initial setup accuracy was consistently achieved in 98% (40/41) cases for a span of five or more vertebrae starting from T2 vertebra and extending caudally to S5. The curvature of spinal column along the cervical region and cervicothoracic junction was not easily reproducible between treatment and simulation. Fifty‐seven percent (8/14) of cases in this region had residual setup error of more than 1 mm in nearby vertebrae after alignment using 6D couch with image guidance. In conclusion, 6D couch integrated with image guidance is convenient and accurately corrects small rotational shifts. Consequently, more than three contiguous vertebrae can be aligned within 1 mm with immobilization that reliably reproduces the curvature of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column. Ability of accurate setup is becoming less a concern in limiting the use of stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy to treat multilevel spinal target.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.