1997
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1997273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESO & NOT photometric monitoring of the Cloverleaf quasar

Abstract: Abstract. The Cloverleaf quasar, H1413+117, has been photometrically monitored at ESO (La Silla, Chile) and with the NOT (La Palma, Spain) during the period [1987][1988][1989][1990][1991][1992][1993][1994]. All good quality CCD frames have been successfully analysed using two independent methods (i.e. an automatic image decomposition technique and an interactive CLEAN algorithm). The photometric results from the two methods are found to be very similar, and they show that the four lensed QSO images vary signif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in good agreement with those published previously by Goodrich & Miller (1995), Schmidt & Hines (1999) and Ogle et al (1999), despite of the fact that the total flux and the polarization of B1413+1143 are known to be variable (e.g. Goodrich & Miller 1995;Østensen et al 1997).…”
Section: Description Of Individual Objectssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are in good agreement with those published previously by Goodrich & Miller (1995), Schmidt & Hines (1999) and Ogle et al (1999), despite of the fact that the total flux and the polarization of B1413+1143 are known to be variable (e.g. Goodrich & Miller 1995;Østensen et al 1997).…”
Section: Description Of Individual Objectssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These differences are not seen any longer in the VIMOS dataset, which again is a result favoring microlensing in image D, as 15 years is roughly the expected timescale for microlensing variations in H 1413+117 (Hutsemekers 1993). Finally, Ostensen et al (1997) have shown, from their photometric monitoring between 1987 and 1995, almost parallel light curves for the quasar images, except for image D. Image D exhibits a slightly higher amplitude in its overall variation, which, added to its spectral differences, makes a strong case for additional microlensing affecting image D. -Intrinsic variability: intrinsic variations of the quasar flux coupled with time-delays between its multiple images would also induce spectral differences between the images. Timedelays for this quasar have not been measured yet.…”
Section: Spectral Differences In H 1413+117mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One could say that it is natural that the discovery of X-ray microlensing was made for this quasar, since the Einstein Cross QSO 2237+0305 is the most "popular" object to search for microlensing, because the first cosmological microlensing phenomenon was found by Irwin et al (1989) in this object and several groups have been monitoring the quasar QSO 2237+0305 to find evidence for microlensing. Microlensing has been suggested for the quasar MG J0414+0534 (Angonin-Willaime et al 1999) and for the quasar QSO H1413+117 (Remy et al 1996;Ostensen et al 1997;Turnshek et al 1997;Chae et al 2001). Therefore, in future may be a chance to find X-ray microlensing for other gravitationally lensed systems that have signatures of microlensing in the optical and radio bands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%