2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESCO: single cell expression simulation incorporating gene co-expression

Abstract: Motivation Gene-gene co-expression networks (GCN) are of biological interest for the useful information they provide for understanding gene-gene interactions. The advent of single cell RNA-sequencing allows us to examine more subtle gene co-expression occurring within a cell type. Many imputation and denoising methods have been developed to deal with the technical challenges observed in single cell data; meanwhile, several simulators have been developed for benchmarking and assessing these me… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementation of locCSN requires two key choices: an initialization of the window width for each local test and the thresholding parameter α to derive the zero-one adjacency matrix from the matrix of local test statistics. We simulate coexpression networks using ESCO (17) to evaluate performance of network estimation for various choices of these tuning parameters. We observe that the SD approach for window width recommended by locCSN performs markedly better than the quantile approach utilized by oCSN.…”
Section: Biophysics and Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of locCSN requires two key choices: an initialization of the window width for each local test and the thresholding parameter α to derive the zero-one adjacency matrix from the matrix of local test statistics. We simulate coexpression networks using ESCO (17) to evaluate performance of network estimation for various choices of these tuning parameters. We observe that the SD approach for window width recommended by locCSN performs markedly better than the quantile approach utilized by oCSN.…”
Section: Biophysics and Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of locCSN requires two key choices: an initialization of the window width for each local test and the thresholding parameter α to derive the 0-1 adjacency matrix from the matrix of local test statistics. We simulate coexpression networks using ESCO (36) to evaluate performance of network estimation for various choices of these tuning parameters. We observe that the standard deviation approach for window width recommended by locCSN performs markedly better than the quantile approach utilized by oCSN.…”
Section: Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the importance of local calculations we compare locCSN and oCSN for synthetic data from ESCO (36). The cells are sampled from two populations, one for which a set of genes exhibit pairwise correlation and another for which the genes are independent (Additional file 1: Figure S8a -c).…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also investigated the nature of DFC using simulated data that more closely resemble real scRNA-seq data. We used ESCO [15], a simulator that takes drop-out into account, to generate the data. We designed the data with two cell populations and 15 genes.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%