2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-022-03451-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escherichia coli in different animal feces: phylotypes and virulence genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The isolates belonged to two main phylogroups, A and B1, unlike the predominance of B2 which is commonly reported in human pathogenic E. coli , especially the ExPEC but also those of intestinal disease agents. These findings are consistent with other studies [ 18 , 40 , 41 ] that have reported predominance of phylogroups A and B1 in food animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The isolates belonged to two main phylogroups, A and B1, unlike the predominance of B2 which is commonly reported in human pathogenic E. coli , especially the ExPEC but also those of intestinal disease agents. These findings are consistent with other studies [ 18 , 40 , 41 ] that have reported predominance of phylogroups A and B1 in food animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The DNA was obtained from a pure culture on tryptic soy agar (BD Becton Dickinson and Co., Cuautitlán Izcalli, Mexico) via lysis of a bacterial cell suspension at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 3 min. The mdh gene was employed to confirm the identification of E. coli as described by Vasquez et al [ 42 ]. All strains that were confirmed to be E. coli were subjected to the phenotypic screening of ESBL production using the double-disk synergy test according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines [ 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two phylogroups are more common in humans (BAILEY et al, 2010) and have been reported at lower frequencies in some animal species than those found in this study (KILANI et al, 2017;XAVIER et al, 2022). This detection raises two hypotheses: either isolates from phylogroups A and D are part of the microbiota of these animals, unlike some wild species already studied (CRISTÓVÃO et al, 2017;ZURFLUH et al, 2019), or there is external influence, such as contamination of riverbeds by human and domestic animal waste or transmission by contaminated feed (AMARSY et al, 2019;GUENTHER et al, 2011;KARAKAYA et al, 2022).…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%