2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escherichia coli and E nterobacteriaceae counts on poultry carcasses along the slaughterline: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In daily practice, there is an overlap of decontamination methods (carcass washing and trimming) after the carcass review step, which may be beneficial for the sanitary quality of the final products. There is concern about the possibility of contamination diffusion and its expansion to larger carcass areas after washing (Belluco et al, 2016). This possibility was not found in the present study since there were no differences (p>0.05) between treatments, including for carcasses without contamination.…”
Section: Decontamination Methods Efficiencyexperimental Assaycontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In daily practice, there is an overlap of decontamination methods (carcass washing and trimming) after the carcass review step, which may be beneficial for the sanitary quality of the final products. There is concern about the possibility of contamination diffusion and its expansion to larger carcass areas after washing (Belluco et al, 2016). This possibility was not found in the present study since there were no differences (p>0.05) between treatments, including for carcasses without contamination.…”
Section: Decontamination Methods Efficiencyexperimental Assaycontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Carcass washing as a reducing factor of microbiological contamination (Table 3) was effective (p<0.0001), causing a reduction of the total bacterial count (Log 10 CFU/g) of E. coli (Log 10 CFU/g) and enterobacteria (Log 10 CFU/g) (Table 3) by 24.52%, 30.26%, and 28.71%, respectively. The meta-analysis study by Belluco et al (2016) also demonstrated a reduction of microbial load of E. coli and enterobacteria after carcass washing. Isolan et al, (2019) also observed a reduction of microbial load of Salmonella after carcass washing.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Reduction Of Microbiological Contamination Befmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These included poultry [78], cattle [41,[69][70][71][72][79][80][81] and pigs [61,82]. Non-farm animals where E. coli studies have been meta-analyzed were mice [77].…”
Section: E Coli Meta-analyses Involving Non-human Animals and Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%