1969
DOI: 10.1306/5d25c971-16c1-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escarpments, Reef Trends, and Diapiric Structures, Eastern Gulf of Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this hypothesis, the deposition of shallow water carbonate banks was restricted to horsts/paleo‐highs, while the grabens were filled with deep‐water sediments. (b) The second hypothesis, known as the “Megabank hypothesis” (Bryant et al., 1969; Meyerhoff & Hatten, 1968; Schlager & Ginsburg, 1981), suggests that during the Late Jurassic to the Mid‐Cretaceous, an extensive shallow‐water carbonate platform developed from the West Florida shelf to the Bahamas. Carbonate banks persisted in various forms throughout the Bahamas region during the Late Cretaceous and the beginning of the Cenozoic (Eberli & Ginsburg, 1987; Ladd & Sheridan, 1987; Sheridan et al., 1981).…”
Section: Geological Setting: a Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this hypothesis, the deposition of shallow water carbonate banks was restricted to horsts/paleo‐highs, while the grabens were filled with deep‐water sediments. (b) The second hypothesis, known as the “Megabank hypothesis” (Bryant et al., 1969; Meyerhoff & Hatten, 1968; Schlager & Ginsburg, 1981), suggests that during the Late Jurassic to the Mid‐Cretaceous, an extensive shallow‐water carbonate platform developed from the West Florida shelf to the Bahamas. Carbonate banks persisted in various forms throughout the Bahamas region during the Late Cretaceous and the beginning of the Cenozoic (Eberli & Ginsburg, 1987; Ladd & Sheridan, 1987; Sheridan et al., 1981).…”
Section: Geological Setting: a Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On escarpments, erosion by gravity flows is thought to be restricted to the sediment veneer (Bryant et al, 1969;Freeman-Lynde, 1983;Paull, Freeman-Lynde, et al, 1990;Twichell et al, 1996). However, we do see a stark difference in the morphology of the escarpments-gentler slope gradient, convex slope profile-where the v-shaped canyons are located.…”
Section: Origin Of V-shaped Canyons and Scarsmentioning
confidence: 99%