2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0738248010000763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escaping the Grip of Personal Law in Colonial India: Proving Custom, Negotiating Hindu-ness

Abstract: Postcolonial perspectives on India's past have tended to focus on representations, which served the purpose of colonial domination. The view, for instance, that Indian society is fundamentally constituted by caste or religion legitimated the supposedly secular or neutral system of governance introduced by the British. Building upon Edward Said's Orientalism (1978), scholars have suggested that some of our most widely held assumptions about Indian society were more rooted in an imperial worldview than in real s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4-5). 31 Mallampalli (2010) shows how the proof of one's customs could be used in order to escape to personal law in the first decades of colonization, before being abandoned for more rigid rules after 1860. 32 Bonnan (1999).…”
Section: Taking Account Of the History Of The Wordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4-5). 31 Mallampalli (2010) shows how the proof of one's customs could be used in order to escape to personal law in the first decades of colonization, before being abandoned for more rigid rules after 1860. 32 Bonnan (1999).…”
Section: Taking Account Of the History Of The Wordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most significant may be concern over the theoretical appropriateness or material relevance of a distinction that is drawn throughout this article between formal and informal or customary law. Within the colonial legal history literature, scholars have come increasingly to soften and downplay notions of a strict formal versus customary law divide, being inclined instead to emphasize both the instability of custom as law and the deep and mutually constitutive relationship between so-called custom and legal politics (Mallampalli 2010). This is not to say the distinction is entirely facile, however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonial imprint that the personal law regime bears can be traced back to the transformation of the customary rules of numerous communities into religion-based 'personal laws' of two distinct religious groups: Hindus and Muslims. Religion was used to classify communities in matters governing their marriage, divorce, custody and inheritance practices (Derrett 1968;Kugle 2001;Mallampalli 2010;Menski 2003;Williams 2006). The core assumption was that Hindus and Muslims are homogeneous groups adhering to their religion-specific laws.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%