Escaping Entity-Centrism in Financial Services Regulation

Abstract

In the ongoing discussions about financial services regulation, one critically important topic has not been recognized, let alone addressed. That topic is what this Article calls the "entity-centrism" of financial services regulation. Laws and rules are entity-centric when they assume that a financial services firm is a stand-alone entity, operating separately from and independently of any other entity. They are entitycentric, therefore, when the specific requirements and obligations they comprise are addressed only to an abstract and solitary "firm," with little or no contemplation of affiliates, parent companies, subsidiaries, or multi-entity enterprises. Regulatory entity-centrism is not an isolated phenomenon, as it permeates the laws and rules governing many facets of a firm's operations. Moreover, it can be discerned in laws and rules covering many types of financial services activities. In other words, entity-centrism in financial services regulation is pervasive. It is also deeply problematic.This Article calls attention to entity-centrism as manifested in financial services regulation, shows why entity-centrism counters regulatory objectives, and assesses possible explanations for the phenomenon. It does so primarily by evaluating two recent regulatory failures that reveal how entity-focused laws and rules privilege entity boundaries over the various ways in which multiple entities (or entities and individuals) work together as a common enterprise. Accordingly, the Article contends that financial services regulation should look past entity boundaries and that lawmakers and regulators should think more broadly, critically,

Enterprise Groups and their Insolvency: It’s the (Common) Interest, Stupid!

“…The fluid and cohesive, in other words, is supplanted by the ossified and (often) warring, all because the enterprise happened to be structured as a collection of separate entities rather than as a single, albeit complex, one.". 23 Several deficiencies characterize this rule-exception approach. enterprise approach.…”

Enterprise without Entities

“…Taking a more skeptical stance, Professor Anita Krug has argued that financial regulation has unduly focused on the entity rather than broader group, affiliate, and contractual relations. 266 For Krug, the entity is too small a unit of analysis. This study of reciprocals spurs us to ask about the inverse question-whether the entity may be too large a unit of analysis.…”