2000
DOI: 10.1155/s1024123x01001521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escape probability and mean residence time in random flows withunsteady drift

Abstract: We investigate fluid transport in random velocity fields with unsteady drift. First, we propose to quantify fluid transport between flow regimes of different characteristic motion, by escape probability and mean residence time. We then develop numerical algorithms to solve for escape probability and mean residence time, which are described by backward Fokker-Planck type partial differential equations. A few computational issues are also discussed. Finally, we apply these ideas and numerical algorithms to a tid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we compare the numerical solution with the analytical solution for the mean exit time [13] in the special case of (7) Figure 2 shows the numerical solutions (the dashed lines) obtained by solving the discretized equations (16) and (17) or (19) with the fixed resolution J = 80, (a, b) = (−1, 1) and different values of α = 0.5, 1, 1.5, while the corresponding analytical solutions are shown with the solid lines. The comparison shows that the numerical solutions are very accurate as one can hardly distinguish the numerical solution from the corresponding analytical one.…”
Section: Comparing With Analytical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we compare the numerical solution with the analytical solution for the mean exit time [13] in the special case of (7) Figure 2 shows the numerical solutions (the dashed lines) obtained by solving the discretized equations (16) and (17) or (19) with the fixed resolution J = 80, (a, b) = (−1, 1) and different values of α = 0.5, 1, 1.5, while the corresponding analytical solutions are shown with the solid lines. The comparison shows that the numerical solutions are very accurate as one can hardly distinguish the numerical solution from the corresponding analytical one.…”
Section: Comparing With Analytical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve the numerical optimization problems (5) and (8), we need a numerical scheme to simulate the solutions of (3) and (6) for given initial guesses α, γ, ǫ, respectively. In this Appendix, we only recall a finite difference scheme [12] for solving (3), as a similar scheme works for (6).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for x ∈ (a, b); and u(x) = 0 for x / ∈ (a, b). Numerical approaches for the mean exit time and escape probability in the SDEs with Brownian motions were considered in [4,5], among others. In the following, we describe the numerical algorithms for the special case of (a, b) = (−1, 1) for clarity of the presentation.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation is solved via a finite element code [2,3]. The (spatial) average mean residence time U is defined by In particular, we consider a cellular domain which surrounds the fixed point, in order to investigate more detailed behavior about this stochastic system.…”
Section: Mean Residence Time For Circuit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%