1988
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0461:ehftsb>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escape hypothesis for the Stikine block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) were probably closely associated with North America since their inception (Davis et al 1978;Wernicke and Klepacki 1988;Jackson et al 1992), paleontologic (Monger and Ross 197 1 ;Tozer 1982), paleomagnetic (Packer and Stone 1974;Jones et al 1977), geologic (Gehrels and Saleeby 1987), and isotopic (Armstrong 1988) data suggest that the Insular terrane evolved independently from North America for much of the Phanerozoic. Because of the primitive (mantle-derived) isotopic character and large size of the Insular and Intermontane terranes, it is important for paleogeographic and crustal-growth models (e.g., Samson et al 1989) to determine the nature and timing of their accretion to and consolidation with the North American continental margin.…”
Section: Regional Significance Of Jurassic and Cretaceous Plutonismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1) were probably closely associated with North America since their inception (Davis et al 1978;Wernicke and Klepacki 1988;Jackson et al 1992), paleontologic (Monger and Ross 197 1 ;Tozer 1982), paleomagnetic (Packer and Stone 1974;Jones et al 1977), geologic (Gehrels and Saleeby 1987), and isotopic (Armstrong 1988) data suggest that the Insular terrane evolved independently from North America for much of the Phanerozoic. Because of the primitive (mantle-derived) isotopic character and large size of the Insular and Intermontane terranes, it is important for paleogeographic and crustal-growth models (e.g., Samson et al 1989) to determine the nature and timing of their accretion to and consolidation with the North American continental margin.…”
Section: Regional Significance Of Jurassic and Cretaceous Plutonismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An alternative model, the so-called escape hypothesis (Wernicke & Klepacki, 1988), invokes the southern part of Wrangellia as an indenting element, with initial collision with North America occurring in Middle Jurassic time. As a result, Stikinia was squeezed northward during Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous times.…”
Section: Palaeobiogeography and Rotation Of Terranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming Quesnellia is the product of Cache Creek subduction, then Stikinia lacks an equivalent accretionary complex if current terrane configurations are used. One solution is to infer that Stikinia and Quesnellia were part of the same arc generated in Mesozoic time by subduction of the Cache Creek oceanic crust, as indicated by Wernicke and Klepacki (1988). Quesnellia, exemplified by the Harper Ranch Group, also shows some similarity to both Stikinia and Eastern Klamath terrane, but further comparison is beyond the scope of this paper (Monger 1989;Orchard and Forster 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%