2018
DOI: 10.3386/w24810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escalation of Scrutiny: The Gains from Dynamic Enforcement of Environmental Regulations

Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency uses a dynamic approach to enforcing air pollution regulations, with repeat offenders subject to high fines and designation as high priority violators (HPV). We estimate the value of dynamic enforcement by developing and estimating a dynamic model of a plant and regulator, where plants decide when to invest in pollution abatement technologies. We use a fixed grid approach to estimate random coefficient specifications. Investment, fines, and HPV designation are costly to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For multi-product plans, we apportion plant-level emissions to products according to those products' revenue shares within the plant, using year 1990 data. 6,7 We take the total emissions attributable to each product in 1990 and divide by the total product shipments in 1990 to construct emissions intensities. 8 We then use these 1990 product-level emissions intensities to project the scale and composition effects forward in time, holding technology (i.e., our emissions intensities) constant at 1990 emissions rates.…”
Section: A Statistical Decomposition Of Us Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For multi-product plans, we apportion plant-level emissions to products according to those products' revenue shares within the plant, using year 1990 data. 6,7 We take the total emissions attributable to each product in 1990 and divide by the total product shipments in 1990 to construct emissions intensities. 8 We then use these 1990 product-level emissions intensities to project the scale and composition effects forward in time, holding technology (i.e., our emissions intensities) constant at 1990 emissions rates.…”
Section: A Statistical Decomposition Of Us Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allocating inputs to products based on their revenue shares, an analogous approach, is standard in the productivity literature(Foster, Haltiwanger, and Syverson 2008;Collard-Wexler and De Loecker 2015). We discuss alternative approaches below 7. Previous research has used the World Bank's Industrial Pollution Projection System (IPPS) for emissions intensities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating these effects will be important for comprehensively evaluating ongoing efforts to improve air quality worldwide. These include recent efforts to reduce vehicle emissions in China (Li 2017) and industrial emissions in the U.S. (Blundell, Gowrisankaran, and Langer 2018) via the Clean Air Act regulations that we consider in this paper. We find that the EPA's expansion of the Clean Air Act to target PM2.5 specifically led to improvements in newly regulated areas that averted approximately 182,000 people with dementia in 2013, yielding $214 billion in benefits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But a finding of no violations, Dari-Mattiacci and Raskolnikov (2020b) emphasize, is often more than just a neutral result. Passing an inspection may lead to a designation as a low-risk regulated party, reducing future inspection costs and possibly even future fines (Black and Baldwin 2012;Blundell, Gowrisankaran, and Langer 2020). It may result in a regulatory stamp of approval for a practice, a design, or a reporting position of previously questionable legality.…”
Section: All Sticks No Carrots?mentioning
confidence: 99%