Escalation of commitment as an antecedent to noncompliance with information security policy

Abstract

Purpose -This study aims to identify antecedents to noncompliance behavior influenced by decision contexts where investments in time, effort and resources are devoted to a taskreferred to as a task unlikely to be completed without violating the organization's information security policy (ISP).Design/methodology/approach -An empirical test of the suggested relationships in the proposed model was conducted through a field study using the survey method for data collection. Pre-tests, pre-study, main study and a follow-up study compose the frame of our methodology where more than 500 respondents are involved across different organizations.Findings -The results confirm that the antecedents that explain the escalation of commitment behavior in terms of the effect of lost assets, such as time, effort and other resources, give us a new lens to understand noncompliance behavior; employees seem to escalate their commitments to the completion of their tasks at the expense of becoming noncompliant with ISP.Research limitations/implications -One of the key areas that requires further attention from this study is to better understand the role of risk perceptions on employee behavior when dealing with value conflicts. Depending on how risk-averse or risk seeking an employee is, the model showed no significant support in either case to influence their noncompliance behavior. The authors therefore argue that employees' noncompliance may be influenced by more powerful beliefs, such as self-justification and sunk costs.Practical implications -The results show that when employees are caught in tasks undergoing difficulties, they are more likely to increase noncompliance behavior. By understanding better how project obstacles result in such tasks, security managers can define new mechanisms to counter employees' shift from compliance to noncompliance.Social implications -Apart from encouraging compliance with enforcement mechanisms (using direct behavioral controls like sanctions or rewards), indirect behavior controls may also encourage compliance. The authors suggest that the ISPs should state that the organization would take positive actions toward task completion and help their employees to resolve their problems quickly.Originality/value -This study is the first to tackle escalation of commitment theories and use antecedents that explain the effect of lost assets, such as time, effort and other resources can also explain noncompliance with ISP in terms of the value conflicts, where employees would often choose to forego compliance at the expense of finishing their tasks.

That’s why they didn’t let it go: exploring the roots of women entrepreneurs’ escalation of commitment

“…The second one is the prospect theory, which suggests that individuals' intention to escalate on their decisions depends on the effect of sunk cost as well as their risk perceptions (Tversky and Khaneman, 1981). According to the prospect theory, individuals who have not experienced a previous loss are more likely to engage in riskseeking and even continue a failing course of action (Kajtazi et al, 2018).…”

Phishing for Long Tails: Examining Organizational Repeat Clickers and Protective Stewards

“…Research showing how employees can influence the effectiveness of their respective organizations' cybersecurity efforts is well documented (Crossler et al, 2013;Warkentin & Willison, 2009). In fact, a substantial body of literature has examined the detrimental impacts of employee behavior like computer abuse (Lee et al, 2004;Straub & Nance, 1990;Willison & Warkentin, 2013), noncompliance with information security policies (ISPs; Gwebu et al, 2020;Kajtazi et al, 2018;Lowry & Moody, 2015), and shadow IT utilization (Silic & Back, 2014;Zimmermann & Rentrop, 2014). Conversely, research has also shown how employees can act as "protective stewards" of sensitive organizational assets as they actively attempt to defend their organizations from threats (Burns et al, 2018;Posey et al, 2013Posey et al, , 2015.…”

A Model of Information Security Policy Compliance for Public Universities: A Conceptual Model

“…An understanding of security policy provides a new lens for learning noncompliance behavior. Employees sometimes sacrifice compliance with information security policies to complete their duties [34] Sharma, which states that organizational commitment influences behavioral intentions to comply with the Security Policy Information and employee status has an impact on organizational commitment [35]. This study argues that organizational commitment can improve compliance directly without influencing with user intention or employee status.…”