2013
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escalating-dose HLA-mismatched DLI is safe for the treatment of leukaemia relapse following alemtuzumab-based myeloablative allo-SCT

Abstract: Although the feasibility of using HLA-mismatched unrelated donors as an alternate graft source for haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) has been shown, little is known about the safety of HLA-mismatched DLI for the treatment of relapse. We examined the outcome of 58 consecutive leukaemia patients who received escalating-dose DLI for treatment of relapse after alemtuzumab-conditioned myeloablative unrelated donor HSCT at our institution. High-resolution HLA typing on stored DNA samples revealed mismatches in 28/58 patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Innes et al 2013 [55] Modified DLI HIT and MRDT Eight hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled, this study suggest that risk stratification-directed modified DLI may reduce relapse and improve survival of subjects with standard-risk acute leukemia after HSCT, although the effect of DLI on immune reconstitution need to be investigated.…”
Section: Genetically Modified Donor T Cell Infusionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Innes et al 2013 [55] Modified DLI HIT and MRDT Eight hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled, this study suggest that risk stratification-directed modified DLI may reduce relapse and improve survival of subjects with standard-risk acute leukemia after HSCT, although the effect of DLI on immune reconstitution need to be investigated.…”
Section: Genetically Modified Donor T Cell Infusionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Unfortunately, serious infections and disease relapse resulting from delayed immune reconstitution remain the 2 most frequent causes of mortality after allogeneic HSCT, particularly in patients who received extensively TCD CD34 þ cell megadose allografts [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Advances in the understanding of immune recovery profiles in haploidentical recipients [8,, along with new methods of modifying donor T cells [48][49][50] and natural killer (NK) cells [51], have made it possible to establish new strategies to improve post-transplantation immunologic reconstitution [9,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although concerns rise about potential higher rates of GvHD in DLI from mismatched donors compared with matched donors, some data suggest that its use might be equally safe. Recently, Innes et al [55] reported a comparison of two cohorts (matched and mismatched donors) of 43 patients (mostly CML) who underwent a cyclophosphamide (Cy) total body irradiation in in vivo TCD (alemtuzumab) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT and received DLI either for MC or relapse. They found no statistical difference between both cohorts in terms of incidence of acute GvHD, 5-year OS, and probability of remission.…”
Section: Toxicity Related To DLImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74,75 Similarly, several retrospective studies also suggested no significant difference between unrelated and related DLI in the incidence of GVHD. [76][77][78] Limited clinical data are available on haploidentical DLI. As haploidentical HSCT has been employed worldwide, 79 it is expected that a series of studies on haploidentical DLI will be available in the near future.…”
Section: Gvhd and Gvl After DLImentioning
confidence: 99%