2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-56762009000600010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escala diagramática para avaliação da severidade da mancha de Phoma do cafeeiro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the repeatability of estimates with both scales, 7 days after the first evaluation with the scale, we made a new sequence of the same coffee berries, and the same evaluators made a second visual estimation (Salgado et al. ; Custódio et al. and Santos et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the repeatability of estimates with both scales, 7 days after the first evaluation with the scale, we made a new sequence of the same coffee berries, and the same evaluators made a second visual estimation (Salgado et al. ; Custódio et al. and Santos et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagrammatic scale proposed in this article like others, were constructed defining the intervals according to the law of "Weber-Fechner" (Custódio et al, 2011;Salgado et al, 2009), however, without following the same intervals of severity proposed by Horsfall and Barratt (1945) due to the disease's peculiarity. Among these characteristics, the maximum severity found in the field and the frequency intervals of higher concentration for the severity of the disease must be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagrammatic scales have the function of helping in the determination of the leaf injured area, approximating the evaluation from the real. In general, the diagrammatic scales that have already been built up provide more precision and accuracy in relation to the evaluations without its use (Capucho et al, 2011;Salgado et al, 2009). Without using the scale, the evaluators tended to overestimate the disease (Belan et al, 2014, Custódio et al, 2011 and in relation to the hypotheses β 0 = 0 e β 1 = 1, were less accepted when scales in the evaluation of the disease severity were not used (Andrade et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A escala diagramática pode diminuir essa subjetividade, aumentando a acurácia e a precisão das estimativas dentre os diferentes avaliadores, como já demonstrado em outros patossistemas (Martins et al, 2004;Kowata et al, 2008;Salgado et al, 2009;Sachs et al, 2011). No entanto, esta escala deve ser de fácil uso, aplicada a diferentes condições e idades da planta e produzir resultados reproduzíveis.…”
unclassified