Escala de objetivos atingidos (GAS)

Abstract

A navegação consulta e descarregamento dos títulos inseridos nas Bibliotecas Digitais UC Digitalis, UC Pombalina e UC Impactum, pressupõem a aceitação plena e sem reservas dos Termos e Condições de Uso destas Bibliotecas Digitais, disponíveis em https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/termos.Conforme exposto nos referidos Termos e Condições de Uso, o descarregamento de títulos de acesso restrito requer uma licença válida de autorização devendo o utilizador aceder ao(s) documento(s) a partir de um endereço de IP da instituição detentora da supramencionada licença.Ao utilizador é apenas permitido o descarregamento para uso pessoal, pelo que o emprego do(s) título(s) descarregado(s) para outro fim, designadamente comercial, carece de autorização do respetivo autor ou editor da obra. Na medida em que todas as obras da UC Digitalis se encontram protegidas pelo Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos e demais legislação aplicável, toda a cópia, parcial ou total, deste documento, nos casos em que é legalmente admitida, deverá conter ou fazer-se acompanhar por este aviso. Escala de objetivos atingidos (GAS) Autor(es):Sotero, Luciana; Relvas, Ana Paula Palavras -chave: resultados terapêuticos, objetivos terapêuticos, intervenção familiar, GAS. AbstractThe Portuguese version of the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS;Kiresuk & Sherman, 1968) is the Escala de Objetivos Atingidos and can be used in research or clinical practice as a method for evaluating the results obtained in family therapy, in an intervention program or in other support services oriented to the family group. This version is adapted to the context of family intervention, although the GAS can be used in several populations and contexts. At the beginning of the intervention, this method allows to identify the goals to be achieved, later analyzing the extent to which they were achieved as a result of the intervention. Based on a random sample of 40 cases of Systemic Family Therapy studies of reliability (interrater agreement) and validity (content and social) were performed. The advantages and limitations of using this method of evaluation are explored and some recommendations are made to promote an appropriate implementation.

When the family is opposed to coming to therapy: A study on outcomes and therapeutic alliance with involuntary and voluntary clients.

“…Although psychometric studies on the GAS should be conducted case by case so as to take into account the singularities of each context, problematic and/or intervention (Schlosser, 2004), several studies report good levels of interjudge agreement, with ICC coefficients ranging from .88 to .93 (Shefler, Canetti, & Wiseman, 2001;Stolee, Stadnyk, Myers, & Rockwood, 1999). Portuguese studies with the GAS support the evidence of reliability (interrater agreement; range from .94 to .97) and validity (content and social; Sotero & Relvas, 2014b).…”

“…Goal Attainment Scaling. To evaluate the outcomes, a Portuguese version of the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS; Escala de Objetivos Atingidos; Kiresuk & Sherman, 1968;Sotero & Relvas, 2014b) was used, adapted from the Spanish version for family interventions (López & Escudero, 2003). At the beginning of the therapy (first session), this method identified the goals to be achieved, later analyzing the extent to which they were indeed attained as a result of the intervention (last session).…”

“…These tasks can be done conjointly (by the family members and the therapist), separately, or by external evaluators. In fact, the use of the GAS in multiple contexts (e.g., rehabilitation, education, nursing, and occupational therapy) has caused new variants of the original procedure to emerge, and one can find diverse studies in which the definition of goals and/or evaluation of the outcomes was carried out by professionals, clients, external evaluators, or by combinations of these (Sotero & Relvas, 2014b). A full description of the GAS can be found in Kiresuk et al (1994), along with excellent criteria for scoring (pp.…”