Escala de incapacidad por dolor lumbar de Oswestry

Alcántara-Bumbiedro, S.; Flórez-García, Mariano Tomás; Echávarri-Pérez, C.; García-Pérez, Fernando

doi:10.1016/s0048-7120(06)74881-2

Cited by 72 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Barthel Index is a measure of independence in the activities of daily living (ADL). This index consists of [24]. The test-retest reliability of the ODI is 0.92, which is very high [25].…”

Section: ) Functional Abilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Interferential Current Treatment on Pain, Functional Ability, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke Patients with Lumbago; A Randomized Controlled Study

Jung

2020

KSPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE: This study examined the efficacy of an interferential current (IFC) treatment on the improvement of pain, disability, and quality of life in stroke patients with lumbago. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 stroke patients with lumbago. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups: the IFC treatment group (n= 20) and the placebo treatment group (n= 20). The IFC group received 30 minutes of IFC treatment on the lumbar region, while the placebo group received IFC treatment but without real electrical stimulation. The intervention was administered five days a week for four weeks. The primary outcomes of pain intensity were measured using a visual analogue scale. The secondary measurements included the

show abstract

Section: ) Functional Abilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Interferential Current Treatment on Pain, Functional Ability, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke Patients with Lumbago; A Randomized Controlled Study

Jung

2020

KSPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Oswestry Disability Index is a self-applied questionnaire specific for low back pain that measures limitations in daily activities that can be affected by pain and is validated in Spanish [29]. Higher scores show a higher level of disability [26].…”

Section: The Oswestry Disability Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire Spanish Version in Musicians

Gómez-Rodríguez¹,

Díaz-Pulido

Gutiérrez-Ortega

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Standardised Nordic Questionnaire (SNQ) is an instrument to analyse the musculoskeletal symptoms in an ergonomic or occupational health context. We aimed to cross-culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the SNQ among Spanish musicians. Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation (reliability, validity, and feasibility) was performed. Reliability was analysed by test-retest reliability (Cohen's Kappa) and internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson). Content and face validity were measured by the Expert Committee and the opinion of participants. Construct validity (Mann-Whitney U test) was measured by comparing with questionnaires used to assess pain and disability in neck, shoulders, upper back, and low back regions. Feasibility was calculated with the average response time. Results: A total of 312 Spanish musicians were included. The Spanish version of SNQ achieved good semantic, conceptual, idiomatic, and content equivalence. For most of the variables, test-retest reliability was good to very good (k = 0.60-0.81). The internal consistency showed good to acceptable (Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR20) = 0.737-0.873). Participants with versus without musculoskeletal problems in a related region showed significantly higher disability/pain, indicating a good construct validity. About the feasibility, the average response time of the questionnaire was 6 min (±2). Conclusions: The results show that the Spanish SNQ is reliable, valid, and feasible screening tool to assess musculoskeletal problems among musicians.Playing-related 12-month prevalence ranged between 62% and 93% [3]. The neck, shoulders, and low back were the most frequently affected regions [3,4].Thus, the evaluation of playing-related musculoskeletal disorder in the musician´s occupational context is an important outcome, in order to quantify, classify, and design an adequate treatment. The most commonly used instrument to detect the musician with symptoms is the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire (SNQ) [5][6][7][8][9].The SNQ was developed in 1987 by Kuorinka et al. from a project funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers. It is an internationally self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate musculoskeletal problems in an ergonomic or occupational health context. It consists in two parts: The general part and the specific lumbar, neck, and shoulders questionnaires. The SNQ has proved to be a valid, reliable, and feasible tool that allows for comparison of musculoskeletal problems among different anatomical areas in epidemiological studies [10]. With these studies, specific health promotion and prevention measures can be designed for each work environment. In general, it shows a good concordance with the functional clinical evaluation, but it should not be used as a tool to confirm the diagnosis of a disorder or a pathology, because it presents an important amount of false positives [11].The SNQ has been adapted and validated to other languages [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], but the Spanish version has not ...

show abstract

“…Una última valoración se realizó a los 21 días (semana 3), para registrar el nivel final de dolor, cambio en el consumo de medicamentos y escala de funcionalidad realizada al inicio de la intervención terapéutica (Índice de discapacidad cer vical/Cuestionario de discapacidad lumbar de Oswestry, según correspondía) 14,15 , considerando el cambio de nivel como punto de mejoría, empeoramiento o igualdad.…”

Section: Figura 2 Terapia Neural En Campos Interferentes Polos Amigunclassified

Eficacia de la terapia neural en pacientes con dolor cervical o lumbar, del servicio de medicina física y rehabilitación de un centro hospitalario, 2016

Olarte¹,

Rangel²

2017

Rev Col Med Fis Reh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eficacia de la terapia neural en pacientes con dolor cervical o lumbar, del servicio de medicina física y rehabilitación de un centro hospitalario, 2016 Rev Col Med Fis Rehab 2017;27(1):25-37-http://revistacmfr.org DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.v27n1a2 Rev Col Med Fis Rehab 2017;27(1):25-37-http RESUMENObjetivos: 1) Evaluar la eficacia de la terapia neural (TN) con procaína al 1% comparada con placebo. 2) Comparar la TN segmentaria con y sin tratamiento de campos interferentes, en pacientes con dolor cervical o lumbar de la consulta externa del servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación en un centro hospitalario. Materiales y métodos: Ensayo clínico controlado, aleatorizado, simple ciego, en pacientes con cervicalgia o lumbalgia, de causa mecánica, sin fibromialgia, sin alergia a anestésicos locales, ni realización simultánea de terapia física. Intervención: 3 sesiones de orden semanal, con procaína 1% o placebo (SSN 0,9%) bajo la técnica de pápulas intradérmicas, iniciando con terapia segmentaria y derivando a manejo de campos interferentes según el fenómeno segmentario presentado. Revaloración a los 7, 14 y 21 días, con medición de EVA y consumo de medicamentos. Además, escala de funcionalidad al inicio y final de tratamiento. Resultados: Sesenta y seis pacientes, 83% mujeres, mediana de 41 años, 47% intervenidos con placebo, 53% con procaína. EVA inicial 5,85 (DE: ±1,72) y final 2,16 (DE: ±1,72), con mejoría significativa a favor de TN con procaína en todas las mediciones (p<0,001). A nivel funcional se encontró mejoría a favor de TN con procaína (p<0,001), del grupo de lumbalgia (p<0,001) y de los tratados con campos interferentes (p<0,001).No hubo diferencia en el consumo de fármacos entre los grupos. Efectos secundarios escasos, sin repercusiones y resolución espontánea. Conclusión: La TN demostró ser eficaz y segura en el tratamiento del dolor cervical y lumbar, además de mejorar la funcionalidad de los pacientes con lumbalgia y los tratados en campos interferentes. Palabras clave: terapia neural, dolor, cervicalgia, lumbalgia.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.v27n1a2 ABSTRACTObjective: 1) To evaluate the effectiveness of neural therapy (NT) with procaine 1% compared to placebo. 2) To compare segmental NT with and without treatment interference fields in patients with neck pain or low back pain, of physical medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. Materials and methods:Controlled clinical trial, randomized, single-blind, in patients with neck pain or low back pain, mechanical cause, without fibromyalgia, without allergy to local anesthetics, or simultaneous physical therapy. Intervention: 3 sessions weekly with procaine 1% or placebo (SSN0.9%) under the technique of intradermal papules, starting with segmental therapy and drifting to management interference fields according segmental phenomenon presented. Evaluation at 0, 7, 14 and 21 days, measuring AVS and consumption of medicines. Additionally, functionality scale was applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment.Results: 66 patients,...

show abstract

Escala de incapacidad por dolor lumbar de Oswestry

Cited by 72 publications

References 43 publications

Effects of Interferential Current Treatment on Pain, Functional Ability, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke Patients with Lumbago; A Randomized Controlled Study

Effects of Interferential Current Treatment on Pain, Functional Ability, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke Patients with Lumbago; A Randomized Controlled Study

Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire Spanish Version in Musicians

Eficacia de la terapia neural en pacientes con dolor cervical o lumbar, del servicio de medicina física y rehabilitación de un centro hospitalario, 2016

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About