2021
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli Carrying CTX-M Genes Circulating among Livestock, Dogs, and Wild Mammals in Small-Scale Farms of Central Chile

Abstract: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria of critical importance for global health such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing (ESBL)-Escherichia coli have been detected in livestock, dogs, and wildlife worldwide. However, the dynamics of ESBL-E. coli between these animals remains poorly understood, particularly in small-scale farms of low and middle-income countries where contact between species can be frequent. We compared the prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL-E. coli among 332 livestock (207 cows, 15 pigs, 6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
29
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(103 reference statements)
8
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, one aspect is the potential dispersal of antibiotic resistant bacteria from released wildlife to livestock and humans; another aspect is the environmental acquisition of antibiotic resistant bacteria by rescued wildlife, especially when this wildlife is found at or near urban areas or near livestock. However, a recent study conducted in the same geographical area as our study, found ESBL-producing E. coli in 24% of dogs, 3% of cows, but only in 0.5% of wildlife [ 48 ], values much lower than our results in the built environment. The different ways by which wildlife may play a role in the acquisition and in the dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, one aspect is the potential dispersal of antibiotic resistant bacteria from released wildlife to livestock and humans; another aspect is the environmental acquisition of antibiotic resistant bacteria by rescued wildlife, especially when this wildlife is found at or near urban areas or near livestock. However, a recent study conducted in the same geographical area as our study, found ESBL-producing E. coli in 24% of dogs, 3% of cows, but only in 0.5% of wildlife [ 48 ], values much lower than our results in the built environment. The different ways by which wildlife may play a role in the acquisition and in the dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, ESBL genes have also been reported from different water sources, Caltagirone et al, 2017 conducted a study in Italy and reported the presence of bla CTX-M along with bla CTX−M in combination with bla SHV in isolates obtained from wells, streams, and water treatment plants. In Chile, a recent study reported the prevalence of ESBL in E. coli in domestic and wild animals, indicating a 30% prevalence in livestock, 24% in dogs, and 0.5% in wild animals; meanwhile, CTX-M enzymes were the most common enzymes in this study, coinciding with the results reported in the present work ( Benavides et al, 2021 ). Other studies in the country have reported bla CTX-M in foxes, Andean condors, and wild felids ( Cevidanes et al, 2020 ; Sacristán et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In Chile, a recent study reported the prevalence of ESBL in E. coli in domestic and wild animals, indicating a 30% prevalence in livestock, 24% in dogs, and 0.5% in wild animals; meanwhile, CTX-M enzymes were the most common enzymes in this study, coinciding with the results reported in the present work (Benavides et al, 2021). Other studies in the country have reported bla CTX-M in foxes, Andean condors, and wild felids (Cevidanes et al, 2020;Sacristán et al, 2020).…”
Section: Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-1 and Esbl Were Found In Isolates Obtained From Vegetables And Watersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, this study was not included in this review because it did not test for ARB or ARGs. Similarly, other studies have simultaneously sampled domestic animals and wildlife where contact between species can be frequent (e.g., small-scale farms) to assess potential crossspecies transmission of ESBL-E. coli (Benavides et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%