Erythemally Weighted Radiometers in Solar UV Monitoring: Results from the WMO/STUK Intercomparison

Abstract

The first international intercomparison of erythemally weighted (EW) broadband radiometers was arranged in 1995 to improve the accuracy and comparability of the measurements carried out by solar UV monitoring networks. The intercomparison was arranged at the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Helsinki, Finland, in cooperation with the University of Innsbruck and with support from the World Meteorological Organization. Altogether 20 EW meters of six different types from 16 countries were (1) tested in the laboratory by measuring the spectral and angular responsivities and (2) calibrated in solar radiation against two reference spectroradiometers. Calibration factors (CFs) for the EW meters were determined by using simultaneously measured EW solar UV spectra as a calibration reference. The CFs averaged over solar elevations higher than 35° varied from 0.87 to 1.75, with the estimated uncertainty being ±10%. As a result of this intercomparison, for the first time the calibrations of more than 100 EW radiometers around the world are possible to trace to the same origin. The present experience indicates that the accuracy of temperature‐controlled EW radiometers is not significantly lower than the accuracy of spectroradiometers provided that strict quality assurance/quality control procedures are followed.

Chemical “light meters” for photochemical and photobiological studies

“…While the y-intercept was not significantly different from zero, the response of the actinometer with respect to the SUV-100 (i.e., the slope) was significantly different from a response of 1.0 at the 95 % confidence level. The basis for this difference was likely due to inherent methodological errors, particularly errors associated with all instrumental methods caused by calibration limitations (4 -5 %) (Leszczynski et al, 1998;Thompson et al, 1997). Another potentially important source of error was due to temperature fluctuations in the water bath resulting from a lack of temperature control at the spectroradiometer station.…”

Total ozone mapping spectrometer retrievals of noon erythemal‐CIE ultraviolet irradiance compared with Brewer ground‐based measurements at El Arenosillo (southwestern Spain)

“…Surface UV‐monitoring stations are sparsely located, and most of them have been operating for a relatively short time, which is not sufficient for trend analysis (i.e., >10 years). Moreover, the ground‐based measurements have been made using a variety of instruments with different calibration procedures [ Leszczynski et al , 1998; WMO , 1996]. Satellite data complement ground‐based measurements providing global daily maps with uniform spatial coverage using single instrument.…”

Cloud effective transmittance at two sites of the Atacama Desert, Chile

“…Manufacturer‐provided calibrations of all instruments were used. It is a known fact that, particularly in the UV range, the manufacturer's calibration is not precise enough for scientific analysis based on absolute values [e.g., Leszczynski et al , 1998]. This is clearly seen in Figure 1 where seasonal maximum UV absolute values at Arica, at sea level, are markedly larger than those from the close higher‐altitude station of Poconchile.…”