2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2009.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eruption and emplacement of a laterally extensive, crystal-rich, and pumice-free ignimbrite (the Cretaceous Kusandong Tuff, Korea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wohletz & Sheridan (1979), Sohn & Chough (1989), Chough & Sohn (1990), Vazquez & Ort (2006), Dellino et al (2008) and Sohn et al (2012) developed facies models for deposition from small-volume PDCs with low densities produced in maar eruptions, and showed how these are related to flow processes. Wilson & Walker (1982), Branney & Kokelaar (1992), Fisher et al (1993), Choux & Druitt (2002) and Sohn et al (2009), among many others, developed transport and depositional models for large-volume PDCs with various particle concentrations. One complication to developing and using these models is that the portion of the flow that is depositing (the depositional system of Fisher 1990) does not necessarily share all characteristics of the portion of the flow that is carrying the particles out from the vent (the transport system).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wohletz & Sheridan (1979), Sohn & Chough (1989), Chough & Sohn (1990), Vazquez & Ort (2006), Dellino et al (2008) and Sohn et al (2012) developed facies models for deposition from small-volume PDCs with low densities produced in maar eruptions, and showed how these are related to flow processes. Wilson & Walker (1982), Branney & Kokelaar (1992), Fisher et al (1993), Choux & Druitt (2002) and Sohn et al (2009), among many others, developed transport and depositional models for large-volume PDCs with various particle concentrations. One complication to developing and using these models is that the portion of the flow that is depositing (the depositional system of Fisher 1990) does not necessarily share all characteristics of the portion of the flow that is carrying the particles out from the vent (the transport system).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation : Lithofacies T1 corresponds to xs or sLT(cr) non‐genetic lithofacies of Branney & Kokelaar (). Its stratigraphic characteristics make this lithofacies similar to the Cretaceous Kusandong Tuff in Korea, a laterally extensive, crystal‐rich, and pumice‐free ignimbrite, generated from shallow‐level fragmentation of magma followed by highly expanded and turbulent flows, able to transport and disperse coarse crystals and lithics over wide areas and to elutriate much of the fine vitric ash (Sohn et al ., , ). Thus, this lithofacies has been interpreted as a crystal‐rich ignimbrite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the positive group appears mainly on the Japanese side, and the negative group appears mostly on the Korean side, except for some zircons of Jindong Formation. One thing to note here is that when Jindong Formation was deposited, the flow direction of paleocurrent indicates the supply of sediment from the east, or the Japanese side [32,[37][38][39]. Therefore, the detrital zircons of the positive group appearing in Jindong Formation may originate from sediment sources in Japan.…”
Section: Negative ε Hf (T) Values Of Cretaceous Zirconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These formations were deposited in either alluvial, fluvial, or lacustrine environments [32]. In the lower layers of the Gyeongsang Basin, sediments were supplied by waters flowing from the west and northwest [33][34][35][36], but sediments constituting the upper layers were supplied from streams flowing from the east, the direction of the Japanese islands connected to the Korean Peninsula at the time [32,[37][38][39]. The maximum depositional ages of the four formations constituting the Hayang Group defined from the youngest U-Pb age populations of detrital zircons are as follows; 109 Ma for the Chilgok Formation, 106 Ma for the Silla Conglomerate, 105 Ma for the Haman Formation, and 100 Ma for the Jindong Formation [19].…”
Section: Introduction and General Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%