2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERT monitoring of gas injection into water saturated sands: Modelling and inversion of cross-hole laboratory data

Abstract: A set of laboratory experiments were performed in order to investigate the capacity of the electrical resistivity tomography method to detect and monitor the circulation of gaseous CO 2 into geological media. The experiments consisted of injecting reactive (CO 2) or inert (N 2) gases into reactive (carbonate) or inert (silica) sands saturated with water. The laboratory setup was a metric-scale cylindrical tank instrumented with electrodes placed on vertical rods, hence simulating a borehole to borehole monitor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our numerical simulations show that ERT is effective at monitoring macroscale gas accumulation primarily around an injector where gas accumulation would be most significant, which is consistent with recent laboratory experiments using ERT to image CO 2 and N 2 gas circulation (e.g., Kremer et al, 2018). However, our results also indicate that the ERT method will be much less effective at resolving thin pools of gas extending beyond the main bulb.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our numerical simulations show that ERT is effective at monitoring macroscale gas accumulation primarily around an injector where gas accumulation would be most significant, which is consistent with recent laboratory experiments using ERT to image CO 2 and N 2 gas circulation (e.g., Kremer et al, 2018). However, our results also indicate that the ERT method will be much less effective at resolving thin pools of gas extending beyond the main bulb.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite these recent successful applications, qualitative and quantitative interpretation of ERT datasets in terms of hydrogeological properties remain very challenging, especially when both moisture content and groundwater ionic content may change simultaneously (Kemna et al, 2002; Koestel et al, 2008; Singha and Gorelick, 2005). This issue has been addressed for laboratory studies where one (or several) physical parameters can be controlled and the medium is usually homogeneous (Bechtold et al, 2012; Binley et al, 1996; Garré et al, 2010; Koestel et al, 2008; Kremer et al, 2018; Slater et al, 2000). Large‐scale field studies usually assume that either solute conductivity or volumetric water content is constant over time to provide quantitative hydrogeological results by using empirical or laboratory petrophysical relationships (Clément et al, 2014; Dimech et al, 2018; Dumont et al, 2018; Hübner et al, 2017; Jayawickreme et al, 2008; Kuras et al, 2009; Uhlemann et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%