2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2019.102011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors related to the automatized satellite-based change detection of boreal forests in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residual cuts tended to be confused with clear-cutting, showing no differences in their spectral response. Reference [18] interpreted similar forest changes using Sentinel-2 images and reached similar conclusions. Efforts to characterize partial cuts and clear-cuts have also been conducted using airborne laser scanning (ALS) data [3,19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Residual cuts tended to be confused with clear-cutting, showing no differences in their spectral response. Reference [18] interpreted similar forest changes using Sentinel-2 images and reached similar conclusions. Efforts to characterize partial cuts and clear-cuts have also been conducted using airborne laser scanning (ALS) data [3,19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Clear-cutting was, as expected, the type of change best characterized, with omission and commission errors similar to those achieved by other authors (8.11% and 15% for scenario A and 5.38% and 31.25% for scenario B). Reference [16] reported an omission error of 16.2% for clear-cutting detection in a boreal area in Canada, and clear-cutting was classified in Finland with commission errors ranging between 7-11.6% [18]. Clear-cutting in France was detected with 19% and 54% of omission and commission error, respectively [17], while in Italy, reference [40] achieved omission errors ranging between 16-55% and commission errors smaller than 15%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction of the harvests is also likely to increase the error variance of the change estimates, so that improved accuracy would be obtained if the harvests were directly observed from the differences between remote sensing materials and used as known control actions rather than predicted using a model as was done here. This is possible for clearcuts, which can be accurately delineated from differences between two satellite images (Pitkänen et al 2020). Moreover, if the change model would reflect purely growth, it would be possible to utilize relative errors (as in Ehlers et al 2013) rather than absolute errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a huge increase in studies using Landsat time series and many of them have focused on change detection methods (Zhu 2017). Abrupt changes can be detected by comparing images from two different time points (Pitkänen et al 2020). Long-term decline or growth, however, requires more images and poses more challenges (Coops et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%