2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00506-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the estimation of the distance of fall and angles of impact blood drops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(32) can be used as suggested by Garrison [4] to determine the angle of impact u from W and L. However, the uncertainty in the calculated angle of impact increases as the angle of impact approaches 908, as has been discussed by Willis et al [7] in connection with the calculation of the angles of impact of blood drops with target surfaces. The use of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(32) can be used as suggested by Garrison [4] to determine the angle of impact u from W and L. However, the uncertainty in the calculated angle of impact increases as the angle of impact approaches 908, as has been discussed by Willis et al [7] in connection with the calculation of the angles of impact of blood drops with target surfaces. The use of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably realistic for substrates that are hydrophilic, but not for hydrophobic substrates, such as greasy tiles, where the stain diameter can be smaller than the maximum diameter reached during impact, as clearly shown in [42] 2) the stain diameter indicates the distance of fall [121], i.e. the impact velocity: this is only true if the initial size of the drop is known, as was also clearly shown in [42].…”
Section: Normal Impactmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The error using the formula (10) is estimated in [89,121]. Note that elliptic stains do not necessarily imply an oblique impact, as any relative motion of the target perpendicular to the drop trajectory can cause a non-circularity in the observed stain, a fact studied experimentally in [123].…”
Section: Oblique Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Willis et al [4] have shown that the uncertainty in the calculated angle of impact of a blood drop is a function of the angle of impact itself. For example, the angle b L is calculated from the width W L and length L L of the bloodstain at point O in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Variation In the Uncertainties Of The Angles Of Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) depends on the following assumptions (which underlie the use of the Balthazard formula): the drop of blood is spherical at the time of impact and has travelled in a straight line to the point of impact. Willis et al [4] showed that the variance in the angle of impact can be calculated accurately from the variances in the width and the length measurements. This shows that the uncertainties in the angles of impact are determined primarily by the uncertainties in the width and length measurements.…”
Section: Effect Of Variation In the Uncertainties Of The Angles Of Immentioning
confidence: 99%