2015
DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2015018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in non-contact sensor measurements due to misalignment and scanning methodology

Abstract: Abstract. Non-contact sensors are becoming an increasingly popular tool for use in dimensional measurement, inspection and quality control. However, there exist a number of challenges associated with the use of these non-contact sensors in dimensional inspection systems. One important challenge is to understand the associated measurement errors and determine the objective accuracy of such an inspection system. This paper examines the effect of misalignment and scanning methodology on the measurement accuracy o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), the wrapped phase is the absolute phase's principal value, i.e., a modulo-2π observation. In optical metrology, InSAR, or any other similar technology, the pair of signal data elements, i.e., U real and U im , and consequently ψ, are not immune to noise, which can originate from a variety of sources [4][5][6] and is the primary cause of inaccuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), the wrapped phase is the absolute phase's principal value, i.e., a modulo-2π observation. In optical metrology, InSAR, or any other similar technology, the pair of signal data elements, i.e., U real and U im , and consequently ψ, are not immune to noise, which can originate from a variety of sources [4][5][6] and is the primary cause of inaccuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention here that the acceptable eccentricity values may wary for different materials and different surface finishes the study of which was beyond the scope of this paper. Moreover, for measuring deep hole, as the alignment of the probe in the hole becomes a major issues as the probe moves down the hole particularly for scanning hole geometry [26,35]. This can also exaggerate the eccentricity of probe.…”
Section: Stage 1 Set 1: Determining the Acceptable Range Of Eccentrimentioning
confidence: 99%