Errors in medication history at hospital admission: prevalence and predicting factors

Abstract

Background An accurate medication list at hospital admission is essential for the evaluation and further treatment of patients. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency, type and predictors of errors in medication history, and to evaluate the extent to which standard care corrects these errors. Methods A descriptive study was carried out in two medical wards in a Swedish hospital using Lund Integrated Medicines Management (LIMM)-based medication reconciliation. A clinical pharmacist identified each patient's most accurate pre-admission medication list by conducting a medication reconciliation process shortly after admission. This list was then compared with the patient's medication list in the hospital medical records. Addition or withdrawal of a drug or changes to the dose or dosage form in the hospital medication list were considered medication discrepancies. Medication discrepancies for which no clinical reason could be identified (unintentional changes) were considered medication history errors. Results The final study population comprised 670 of 818 eligible patients. At least one medication history error was identified by pharmacists conducting medication reconciliations for 313 of these patients (47%; 95% CI 43-51%). The most common medication error was an omitted drug, followed by a wrong dose. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a higher number of drugs at admission (odds ratio [OR] per 1 drug increase = 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.14; p < 0.0001) and the patient living in their own home without any care services (OR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.02-2.45; p = 0.042) were predictors for medication history errors at admission. The results further indicated that standard care by non-pharmacist ward staff had partly corrected the errors in affected patients by four days after admission, but a considerable proportion of the errors made in the initial medication history at admission remained undetected by standard care (OR for medication errors detected by pharmacists' medication reconciliation carried out on days 4-11 compared to days 0-1 = 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.91; p=0.021). Conclusions Clinical pharmacists conducting LIMM-based medication reconciliations have a high potential for correcting errors in medication history for all patients. In an older Swedish population, those prescribed many drugs seem to benefit most from admission medication reconciliation.

Personality Traits of Hospital Pharmacists: Toward a Better Understanding of Factors Influencing Pharmacy Practice Change

“…30,31 This drive to perfection in job performance may also be intuited from the proliferation of pharmacy research papers examining numbers of medication errors in various settings, so that they can be minimized. [32][33][34] Openness, the third trait with a relatively strong difference in response frequencies, is characterized by originality, ingenuity, curiosity, and an artistic orientation. 13 Within work settings, people who exhibit this trait also tend to be drawn to artistic or investigative types of work.…”

Medication reconciliation as a strategy for preventing medication errors

“…Medication reconciliation is one of the barriers proposed to reduce medication errors in health care transitions (Chhabra et al,2011;Knez et al, 2011;Hellstrom et al, 2012). It is a formal process of continuous care that consists of three steps for gathering data: check (patient medication history), clarification (confirmation if the doses, dosages and instructions on medicines are used correctly by the user) and the reconciliation itself (documentation of changes and requirements) (Chhabra et al, 2011).…”

Improving medication safety and diabetes management in Hong Kong: a multidisciplinary approach

“…Pharmacists, as a part of the DMT, are well positioned to optimise pharmacological treatment, educate patients about diabetes management, and promote medication compliance. 3 The major role of a pharmacist in a DMT is to conduct medication reconciliation (MR) and medication review-MR is the process of comparing a patient's prescriptions with all their usual medications and identifying the most complete and updated medication history 4 ; whereas medication review aims to review a patient's medical and drug history, assess their current prescriptions, and ascertain their drug knowledge and compliance. 5 This enables pharmacists to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) that can actually or potentially interfere with optimum health outcomes in specific patients.…”