2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-2468-2_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in Measurement of Magnetic Field and Magnetic Moment with its Associated Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, when the digital Teslameter was positioned in close proximity to the underground cable surface, a reading of 0.26 mT was recorded for a current of 236 A, as shown in Figure 4. [20,21]. In this paper, our aim is to assess the accuracy and reliability of a magnetic flux density model for underground power cables using FEM.…”
Section: Experiments Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, when the digital Teslameter was positioned in close proximity to the underground cable surface, a reading of 0.26 mT was recorded for a current of 236 A, as shown in Figure 4. [20,21]. In this paper, our aim is to assess the accuracy and reliability of a magnetic flux density model for underground power cables using FEM.…”
Section: Experiments Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. External sources of electromagnetic interference: such as radio frequency (RF) signals from communication devices, can impact measurements[20,21]. In this paper, our aim is to assess the accuracy and reliability of a magnetic flux density model for underground power cables using FEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%