2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error sources and guidelines for quality assessment of glacier area, elevation change, and velocity products derived from satellite data in the Glaciers_cci project

Abstract: This is a repository copy of Error sources and guidelines for quality assessment of glacier area, elevation change, and velocity products derived from satellite data in the Glaciers_cci project.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
3
152
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Common problems in ice‐cover mapping from optical imagery are related to shadows as well as cloud and snow cover (Figures a and b; e.g., Winsvold et al, ). In manual approaches, the selection of suitable images is therefore an important but time‐consuming first step (Paul et al, ). In our automatic approach, we tackled these problems by using a pixel‐based instead of an image‐based approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common problems in ice‐cover mapping from optical imagery are related to shadows as well as cloud and snow cover (Figures a and b; e.g., Winsvold et al, ). In manual approaches, the selection of suitable images is therefore an important but time‐consuming first step (Paul et al, ). In our automatic approach, we tackled these problems by using a pixel‐based instead of an image‐based approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment of the uncertainties in the ice displacement maps is essential for the interpretation of changes in glacier dynamics, but is inherently difficult because glacier surface velocities are variable temporally and spatially [49]. For an estimation of the error we compare our satellite-derived displacement maps with products derived from independent image data of better resolution and precision.…”
Section: Error Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ z was estimated based on the mean off-glacier difference between the two DEMs after co-registration and the residual differences after co-registration to ICESat (i.e., the triangulation procedure described in Paul et al, 2017), A is the glacier area, σ area is the error in glacier area, here equal to 0.1 in order to conservatively consider the uncertainty for the glacier areas which is 5% (or 0.05) according to Rastner et al (2012), and z is the mean elevation difference of on-glacier pixels. The uncertainty introduced by the void-filing approach (σ void fill ) we estimated for each glacier as 1.96 standard deviations of the elevation changes resulting from the two void-filling methods considered to produce reasonable results (i.e., local mean and local median, cf.…”
Section: Individual Error Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%