2006
DOI: 10.1080/13658810500399589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error‐sensitive historical GIS: Identifying areal interpolation errors in time‐series data

Abstract: Historical GIS has the potential to re-invigorate our use of statistics from historical censuses and related sources. In particular, areal interpolation can be used to create long-run time-series of spatially detailed data that will enable us to enhance significantly our understanding of geographical change over periods of a century or more. The difficulty with areal interpolation, however, is that the data that it generates are estimates which will inevitably contain some error. This paper describes a techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Areal interpolation has been one of key techniques in historical GIS to establish a consistent spatial framework through which to analyze demographic change over time (Gregory 2000;Gregory and Ell 2006). It has been far less commonly used by historians to construct microhistories of how populations are positioned within the built environment.…”
Section: Methods and Challenges In The Creation Of "Meaningful Boundamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Areal interpolation has been one of key techniques in historical GIS to establish a consistent spatial framework through which to analyze demographic change over time (Gregory 2000;Gregory and Ell 2006). It has been far less commonly used by historians to construct microhistories of how populations are positioned within the built environment.…”
Section: Methods and Challenges In The Creation Of "Meaningful Boundamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So dramatic were Areal interpolation enables us to reconcile these transformations of administrative units in order to facilitate time-series analysis of population change. To standardize divergent boundary data sets over time we calculated the difference between two areal units and then reallocated the data relative to the areal proportions of each unit (Gregory 2000;Gregory and Ell 2006). This technique within GIS is a simple and effective means of redistricting data onto consistent spatial units by calculating the degree of overlap between "source" and "target" geographies.…”
Section: Methods and Challenges In The Creation Of "Meaningful Boundamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areal interpolation is then applied to create a standardized set of administrative boundaries. The results offer great potential, but the approach requires dealing with a great number of errors (Gregory and Ell, 2006). Furthermore, the information required to reconstruct boundary changes is not available for any other territories than England and Wales.…”
Section: Data Sources and Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beard and Chrisman proposed the Zipper algorithm, which finds the closest point pairs within a distance threshold and determines that these pairs are the corresponding point pairs [1]. This algorithm is simple and efficient; thus, it has been adopted in many studies [2][3][4][5]. However, one problem with this algorithm lies in estimating an appropriate threshold because even though the threshold is related to the positional accuracies of the spatial datasets involved, it is not clear how the accuracies are translated into a threshold value [6].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edge matching between adjacent spatial datasets finds and removes the geometric differences of common boundary edges between adjacent spatial datasets [1][2][3][4]. There are two components in this task: feature matching to identify the corresponding point or edge pairs and map alignment to remove the differences in the identified pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%