2011
DOI: 10.1021/ed1004307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Propagation Made Easy—Or at Least Easier

Abstract: Complex error propagation is reduced to formula and data entry into a Mathcad worksheet or an Excel spreadsheet. The Mathcad routine uses both symbolic calculus analysis and Monte Carlo methods to propagate errors in a formula of up to four variables. Graphical output is used to clarify the contributions to the final error of each of the individual variables as well as illustrate how well the results conform to the normal distribution. The Excel routine allows direct entry of the formula and evaluates the erro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard error of the mean (SEM) was used to represent the uncertainty of each prime variable measurement, given by Errors were propagated from directly measured prime variables, such as cell density or metabolite concentration, to each calculated variable q = f ( m 1 , m 2 , …) using the equation (Taylor, 1997) where the sum is over all prime variables that influence the calculated value of q . Numerical finite differencing was applied to estimate the partial derivatives with respect to prime variables (Gardenier et al, 2011). Least‐squares linear regression was performed based on Equations (2) and (5) using the propagated uncertainties δx i and δy i associated with x ‐ and y ‐axis variables, respectively, to determine the weight w i of each data point in the sum‐of‐squared residuals (SSR) objective function where MATLAB's lscov command was used to obtain the weighted least‐squares estimate of the best‐fit line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard error of the mean (SEM) was used to represent the uncertainty of each prime variable measurement, given by Errors were propagated from directly measured prime variables, such as cell density or metabolite concentration, to each calculated variable q = f ( m 1 , m 2 , …) using the equation (Taylor, 1997) where the sum is over all prime variables that influence the calculated value of q . Numerical finite differencing was applied to estimate the partial derivatives with respect to prime variables (Gardenier et al, 2011). Least‐squares linear regression was performed based on Equations (2) and (5) using the propagated uncertainties δx i and δy i associated with x ‐ and y ‐axis variables, respectively, to determine the weight w i of each data point in the sum‐of‐squared residuals (SSR) objective function where MATLAB's lscov command was used to obtain the weighted least‐squares estimate of the best‐fit line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the MatLab code also includes a "sensitivity analysis" (adapted from [2]), where students examine how sensitive the final calculated error is to the errors of the different experimental variables. The sensitivity analysis provides students with explicit information about sources of error so they can make a better assessment of possible improvements to the experimental design.…”
Section: Two Additional Tutorial Labs For In-class Instruction and Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 A Monte Carlo simulation routine for uncertainty propagation has been previously described in the Journal of Chemical Education by Demas et al using a Mathcad routine that can handle up to four input quantities. 5 Monte Carlo methods can be advantageous as compared to the calculus-based approach for error propagation by providing a relatively easy to interpret understanding of the calculation for students and by allowing for the propagation of a wide variety of uncertainty distributions. 4,5 In the teaching laboratory, students are often required to estimate underlying uncertainty distributions of various measurements in the interest of time.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Monte Carlo methods can be advantageous as compared to the calculus-based approach for error propagation by providing a relatively easy to interpret understanding of the calculation for students and by allowing for the propagation of a wide variety of uncertainty distributions. 4,5 In the teaching laboratory, students are often required to estimate underlying uncertainty distributions of various measurements in the interest of time. Many measurements in the chemistry laboratory (interpolation of an analog scale, reading of a nonfluctuating digital signal, and others) are best estimated with uncertainty distributions that are non-Guassian (e.g., triangular uncertainty distributions, uniform uncertainty distributions, etc.).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation