2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error probability performance of chirp modulation in uncoded and coded LoRa systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(18) Note that, for a given 𝛾 b , the bit error probability is a decreasing function of 𝑀 and, for 𝑀 ≥ 64, is the same as the bit error probability of noncoherent LoRa with the spreading factor SF = log 2 𝑀 [16]. This is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: A Binary ("One Bit Per Pulse") Encodingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(18) Note that, for a given 𝛾 b , the bit error probability is a decreasing function of 𝑀 and, for 𝑀 ≥ 64, is the same as the bit error probability of noncoherent LoRa with the spreading factor SF = log 2 𝑀 [16]. This is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: A Binary ("One Bit Per Pulse") Encodingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and it can be shown that P For the coherent 16-ASPM, the designed pulse trainx[k] is given by (19), where n = 2. For the noncoherent 16-ASPM, the designed pulse train iŝ…”
Section: A Noncoherent M-aspmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, where the M-ASPM BER performance is compared with the respective performance of the noncoherent LoRa with different spreading factors. For LoRa, the BER approximation proposed in [19] is used, which is expressed as the product of the union bound on the bit error probability and a correction function.…”
Section: A Noncoherent M-aspmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and it can be shown that P For the coherent 16-ASPM, the designed pulse train x[k] is given by (19), where n = 2. For the noncoherent 16-ASPM, the designed pulse train is…”
Section: B E B /N 0 Efficiency Of Coherent M-aspmmentioning
confidence: 99%