2012
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2012.2186835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Performance Analysis of $M$-ary $\theta$-QAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…in which M is the number of symbols s m,n of the constellation θ-QAM, whose coordinates, (s x i, s y j), are given by [24]…”
Section: A Symbol Error Probability Of a θ-Qam Scheme Under Correlatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in which M is the number of symbols s m,n of the constellation θ-QAM, whose coordinates, (s x i, s y j), are given by [24]…”
Section: A Symbol Error Probability Of a θ-Qam Scheme Under Correlatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation 1, the parameters c 1 , c 2 , c 3 , c 4 , c 5 , and c 6 are related to the geometry of the constellation θ-QAM and are given by the following [16]:…”
Section: Symbol Error Probability Under Generalized Fadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of theoretical analysis and simulations, they showed how to obtain a 0.62-dB power gain with respect to the SQAM constellation and a 0.20-dB power gain with respect to the TQAM regular constellation for a 10 −6 symbol error rate with 64-symbol constellations. The mathematical analysis of the effects of changing the QAM constellation angle θ gave rise to a modulation scheme referred to as parametric θ-QAM, which http://asp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2013/1/104 includes the SQAM and TQAM schemes as special cases [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction: It is well known that cross QAM (CQAM) based on rectangular QAM (RQAM) has lower peak-to-average power ratio and better symbol error performance than RQAM [1]. Recently, θ-QAM based on CQAM was proposed, and the error performance and the optimum constellation for θ-QAM were analysed in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and fading channels [2,3]. It was shown that the symbol error rate (SER) of θ-QAM, when θ is 60°, is lower than that of CQAM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%