2019
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/127/64001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error-insensitive population transfer in a qutrit by invariant-based shortcuts with optimized drivings

Abstract: We develop an effective scheme for implementing error-insensitive population transfer in a three-level system (qutrit) by invariant-based shortcuts with optimized drivings. Based on the method of inverse engineering, target population transfers can be performed in a shortcut manner. Taking into account the deviation errors and then optimizing the coherent drivings, we can improve the target population transfers to be insensitive to deviations of frequency detuning or Rabi coupling. Particularly, with an approp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on H I but with the redesigned Ω (1) d /2π = 250e −(t−τ d ) 2 /τ 2 MHz and Ω (1) m /2π = 250e −(t−τ m ) 2 /τ 2 MHz for t ∈ [0, 250 ns], we also have a full transfer from |e0 to |g1 in the adiabatic case, with τ d = 95 ns, τ = 50 ns, and τ m = 155 ns. However, due to noise effects existing in a process of longer duration time, the fidelity of adiabatic operation significantly degrades to be F A = 74.33% for the same decay rates, where F A has a definition same as that in equation (18). As an example illustration, we comparatively analyze the dependencies of F and F A on κ for the given γ and γ φ , see table 1.…”
Section: Negligible Leakage Effects and High Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on H I but with the redesigned Ω (1) d /2π = 250e −(t−τ d ) 2 /τ 2 MHz and Ω (1) m /2π = 250e −(t−τ m ) 2 /τ 2 MHz for t ∈ [0, 250 ns], we also have a full transfer from |e0 to |g1 in the adiabatic case, with τ d = 95 ns, τ = 50 ns, and τ m = 155 ns. However, due to noise effects existing in a process of longer duration time, the fidelity of adiabatic operation significantly degrades to be F A = 74.33% for the same decay rates, where F A has a definition same as that in equation (18). As an example illustration, we comparatively analyze the dependencies of F and F A on κ for the given γ and γ φ , see table 1.…”
Section: Negligible Leakage Effects and High Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at speeding up quantum adiabatic operation, shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA) have been put forward [10][11][12][13], by which the adiabatic-like process can be still implemented but in an accelerated manner. Due to the effective combination of high robustness and accelerated operation, the method of STA offers an attractive approach towards quantum information tasks [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the point of view of experimental performance, the combination of the invariant-based STA with the optimized Rabi drivings is preferable to information processing especially with composite systems. Recently, the exploration of information processing and state engineering by the technique of STA with optimized drivings has attracted considerable attention both theoretically and experimentally [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that adiabatic evolutions require long run time [19][20][21] and this makes STIRAP vulnerable to environmentinduced decoherence [8]. Recently, shortcuts to adiabaticity * xgf@sdu.edu.cn (STA) [22,23], which includes transitionless quantum driving, invariant-based inverse engineering and fast-forward approaches, has been used to speed up adiabatic population transfers [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and design stimulated Raman exact passage [44][45][46][47][48][49]. However, when using such STA based schemes in spin systems, the existence of the frequency errors still influences the performance of these schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%