Volume 1: Symposia, Parts a and B 2012
DOI: 10.1115/fedsm2012-72290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Estimation Using Hybrid Methods

Abstract: New formalisms are developed for robust calculation of the discretization errors in CFD applications. The new methods are based on the premise that the true error (i.e. the difference between the exact solution and the numerical solution) on a given mesh is similar to the approximate error (i.e. the difference between the fine grid solution and the coarse grid solution). The proportionality constant can be calculated theoretically for a given scheme and it is, to a first order approximation, only a function of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employ the Approximate Error Scaling (AES) method proposed by Celik and others to estimate the local discretization error in time‐averaged gas‐velocity, Vg¯. This method utilizes three substantially different grids preferably with a constant grid refinement ratio, and assumes that the “true error” in the coarse solution is proportional to an “approximate error,” the difference between the fine and coarse grid solutions.…”
Section: Time‐averaged Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ the Approximate Error Scaling (AES) method proposed by Celik and others to estimate the local discretization error in time‐averaged gas‐velocity, Vg¯. This method utilizes three substantially different grids preferably with a constant grid refinement ratio, and assumes that the “true error” in the coarse solution is proportional to an “approximate error,” the difference between the fine and coarse grid solutions.…”
Section: Time‐averaged Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%