2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-005-0589-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error estimates of finite element methods for nonstationary thermal convection problems with temperature-dependent coefficients

Abstract: General error estimates are proved for a class of finite element schemes for nonstationary thermal convection problems with temperaturedependent coefficients. These variable coefficients turn the diffusion and the buoyancy terms to be nonlinear, which increases the nonlinearity of the problems. An argument based on the energy method leads to optimal error estimates for the velocity and the temperature without any stability conditions. Error estimates are also provided for schemes modified by approximate coeffi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from proposing a conforming Galerkin method for the space discretisation of the governing equations (momentum, mass, energy, and enthalpy), our contribution focuses also on deriving stability bounds for the discrete solutions. This result generalises other studies, so far focused on the natural or thermal convection of fluids without phase change, see for instance [1,[4][5][6]8]. In particular, this note summarises the recent results reported in [2] and presents three new numerical tests.…”
Section: Introduction and Governing Equationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Apart from proposing a conforming Galerkin method for the space discretisation of the governing equations (momentum, mass, energy, and enthalpy), our contribution focuses also on deriving stability bounds for the discrete solutions. This result generalises other studies, so far focused on the natural or thermal convection of fluids without phase change, see for instance [1,[4][5][6]8]. In particular, this note summarises the recent results reported in [2] and presents three new numerical tests.…”
Section: Introduction and Governing Equationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Applying the above inequalities with (16) and summing it about n from 0 to J, applying Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3, we get…”
Section: Lemma 35 Under the Conditions Of Lemma 34 There Holdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions are known to cause nonlocal compatibility conditions on the given data as discussed in Heywood and Rannacher in the case of the Navier‐Stokes equations. As that have been stated in theorem 1 of Tabata and Tagami, we do not touch on the behavior of the solutions near the initial time but confine ourselves to an ideal case. Hereafter, C 1 , C 2 ,…, denote some positive constants depending only on Ω.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An upper bound on the Nusselt number for the model under investiagtion which scales like Ra 1 2 was derived in [6]. We also need to consider accurate and effective numerical schemes for the system, especially long time behaviors (see [1] for the case of constant viscosity and long time behavior, [7] for finite time approximation).…”
Section: Conclusion and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%