The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drx044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error estimates of a finite difference method for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system in the subsonic limit regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity of notation, we will only present the numerical method for the KGZ system on one space dimension, and the extensions to higher dimensions are straightforward. Practically, similar to most works for computation of the Zakharov-type equations [8,9,13,19,28], (2.3) is truncated on a bounded interval Ω = (a, b) with the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition:…”
Section: A Uniformly Accurate Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For simplicity of notation, we will only present the numerical method for the KGZ system on one space dimension, and the extensions to higher dimensions are straightforward. Practically, similar to most works for computation of the Zakharov-type equations [8,9,13,19,28], (2.3) is truncated on a bounded interval Ω = (a, b) with the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition:…”
Section: A Uniformly Accurate Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are few results concerning error estimates of different numerical methods for KGZ with respect to mesh size h and time step τ as well as the parameter 0 < ε ≤ 1. Recently, a conservative finite difference method (FDM) was proposed and analyzed in the subsonic limit regime [28], where it was proved that in order to obtain 'correct' oscillatory solutions, the FDM requests the meshing strategy (or ε-scalability) h = O(ε 1/2 ) and τ = O(ε 3/2 ). The reason is due to that N ε (x, t) does not converge as ε → 0 + when α = 0 or β = −1 [21,27,30] The main aim of this paper is to propose and analyze a finite difference method for KGZ, which is uniformly accurate in both space and time for 0 < ε ≤ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are few results concerning error estimates of different numerical methods for KGZ system with respect to mesh size h and time step τ as well as the parameter 0 < ε ≤ 1. Recently, a conservative finite difference method (FDM) was proposed and analyzed in the subsonic limit regime [32], where it was proved that in order to obtain "correct" oscillatory solutions, the FDM requests the meshing strategy (or ε-scalability) h = O(ε 1/2 ) and τ = O(ε 3/2 ). The reason is due to that N ε (x, t) does not converge as ε → 0 + when α = 0 or β = −1 [25,31,34] (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highly temporal oscillatory nature in the solution of the KGS equations (1.10) brings significant numerical difficulties, especially when 0 < ε ≪ 1 [3,28,32]. For example, classical methods may request harsh meshing strategy (or ε-scalability) in order to get 'correct' oscillatory solutions when ε ≪ 1 [8,34]. Recently, we proposed and analyzed uniform accurate finite difference methods for the Zakharov system [3] and Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system [4] in the subsonic limit regime by adopting an asymptotic consistent formulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%